Title
People vs. Abueg
Case
G.R. No. L-54901
Decision Date
Nov 24, 1986
Two intruders forcibly entered a home, assaulted occupants, and caused a fatal injury during a robbery. Convicted of robbery with homicide, penalty reduced to reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-54901)

Factual Background

On the night of November 1, 1973, in Rosario, Cavite, taking advantage of the All Saints' Day festivities, Ricardo Abueg and Deogracias San Pedro entered the home of Diosdado Maraya, seeking to partake in food offerings. Initially welcomed, the atmosphere turned violent when Abueg attacked Norberto Alcaraz with a "chaco," leading to further chaos inside the house. Marciana Maraya, the mother of Diosdado, was later struck in the chest when Abueg forcibly entered the residence, causing her subsequent death from the injuries inflicted. The accused then proceeded to vandalize property and steal clothing.

Procedural History

The trial court rendered a judgment on March 23, 1976, convicting both defendants of robbery with homicide. Given their age (19 years old) at the time, the execution of the death penalty was suspended in accordance with Philippine law, directing their confinement instead to a youth rehabilitation facility.

Nature of the Charges

Abueg and San Pedro faced charges of robbery with homicide. Although they pleaded not guilty, trial evidence presented compelling accounts of their violent actions against the Maraya household, including the fatal attack on Marciana Maraya and the theft of personal belongings valued at P393.00.

Appellant's Claims on Appeal

In his appeal, Abueg asserted several arguments, including the lack of proven conspiracy between him and San Pedro, which he claimed should reduce his culpability to homicide solely. He contested the trial court's findings that he was guilty of robbery with homicide, positing that the crime did not stem from a prior agreement to commit robbery and that his actions were more reactionary and not premeditated. Moreover, he raised a defense of mental incapacity, based on a psychological evaluation.

Court's Findings on Conspiracy and Intent

The court found no merit in Abueg's defense regarding conspiracy, noting that cooperation and shared intent to commit robbery were evident from their simultaneous actions during the incident. The forceful ramming of the door and subsequent destruction of property were indicative of a criminal design that fulfilled the elements of robbery. Moreover, while initial ventures to exact personal vengeance were acknowledged, the escalation of actions leading to robbery and homicide was decisive in affirming the charge.

Mitigating Circumstances

Abueg's argument concerning a lack of intent to do grievous harm was partially considered. The court recognized that the trajectory of events indicated racing passions rather than a pre

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.