Title
People vs. Abubu y Valdez
Case
G.R. No. 129072
Decision Date
Jan 19, 2000
Julius Golocan was killed, and his family critically injured in a 1996 home attack. Antonio Abubu was convicted of murder and frustrated murder, sentenced to reclusion perpetua, and ordered to pay damages.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. 129072)

Background of the Case

  • Accused-appellant Antonio Abubu y Valdez, along with co-accused Jesus Valdez y Bueno and others, was charged with murder and multiple counts of frustrated murder in the Regional Trial Court of Cauayan, Isabela.
  • The charges stemmed from the death of Julius Golocan and injuries to his family members, Flordeliza, John Paul, and Noemi Golocan.
  • Only Abubu and Jesus Valdez were apprehended and arraigned; the others remained at large.
  • The trial court acquitted Jesus Valdez but convicted Abubu, sentencing him to death and ordering him to pay damages to the heirs of the deceased.

Witness Testimony and Credibility

  • Flordeliza S. Golocan identified Abubu as one of the assailants who shot her family.
  • The trial court found her testimony credible, having observed her demeanor during the trial.
  • The Supreme Court emphasized that convictions rely on the credibility of witness testimony rather than the number of witnesses.

Accused's Actions Post-Incident

  • Abubu's actions after the shooting contradicted his claim of innocence; he did not report the incident but sought refuge at his cousin's house.
  • This behavior was interpreted as indicative of guilt, undermining his defense.

Nature of the Crime

  • The Supreme Court determined that the evidence did not support a conviction for the complex crime of murder with multiple frustrated murder.
  • The killings and injuries resulted from distinct acts of shooting by multiple gunmen, not a single act.
  • The presence of two empty shells at the crime scene indicated multiple shooters, reinforcing the conclusion that the acts were separate.

Qualifying Circumstances

  • The prosecution proved the presence of treachery in the attack on Julius Golocan.
  • The sudden and unexpected nature of the assault, coupled with Julius's inability to defend himself while holding his child, established treachery as a qualifying circumstance.

Penalty for Murder

  • Under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code, the penalty for murder ranges from reclusion perpetua to death.
  • In the absence of mitigating or aggravating circumstances, the lesser penalty of reclusion perpetua was imposed on Abubu for the murder of Julius Golocan.

Penalty for Frustrated Murder

  • For the frustrated murders of Flordeliza, John Paul, and Noemi, the penalty of reclusion temporal was applied, being one degree lower t...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.