Title
People vs. Abletes
Case
G.R. No. L-33304
Decision Date
Jul 31, 1974
Two farmers, Victor Abletes and Julio Pamero, ambushed and fatally stabbed Rufo Cote, a tailor, in Giporlos, Eastern Samar, in 1969, motivated by a prior grudge. Convicted of murder, their penalty was modified to reclusion perpetua due to treachery and mitigating factors.

Case Summary (A.M. No. RTJ-94-1131)

Incident Details

On the evening of September 30, 1969, Rufo Cote and his relative Alice Depalco were riding a bicycle heading to the beach when they encountered Abletes and Pamero at a corner near a lighted house. As the two attackers ambushed them, Pamero seized the bicycle handlebar, allowing Abletes to stab Cote, who subsequently fell to the ground and later succumbed to his injuries. Eyewitnesses, including Zosimo Nabelgas and Victor Abadilla, were present during the attack and assisted in bringing Cote to his home.

Preliminary Investigation and Arrest

Following the incident, a murder complaint was swiftly filed by the Chief of Police. Nabelgas and Depalco provided crucial testimonies detailing the attack. Abletes surrendered to authorities the night of the murder, while Pamero initially concealed his whereabouts but was later apprehended.

Trial Proceedings

The trial included testimonies from several witnesses, with Pamero claiming an alibi that was contradicted by his familiarity with the victim and the context of the attack. Abletes asserted a defense of self-defense, alleging that he was attacked by Cote, which the trial court found implausible given the evidence presented.

Court's Findings

The trial court described Abletes’ claim of self-defense as incredible, highlighting the credible and consistent testimonies of the prosecution witnesses. The court determined that the actions of Abletes and Pamero demonstrated intent to kill due to their coordinated assault on Cote, constituting conspiracy and treachery.

Legal Issues of Treachery and Mitigating Circumstances

The prosecution established that the killing was premeditated, executed with treachery as Cote was ambushed unexpectedly, providing him no opportunity to defend himself. While both defendants proffered arguments regarding mitigating circumstances, such as voluntary surrender and lack of education, the court maintained that thes

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.