Title
People vs. SPS. XXX62581 and YYY262581
Case
G.R. No. 262581
Decision Date
Aug 16, 2023
Spouses were convicted of raping their 14-year-old daughter. The CA affirmed the RTC's ruling, emphasizing the credibility of the victim's testimony.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 262581)

Facts of the Case

XXX and YYY were charged under Article 266-A of the Revised Penal Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 8353. The Information alleges that in 2008, while their daughter AAA, then 14 years old, was subjected to sexual intercourse through force and intimidation, the accused conspired to commit the crime. During the trial, the prosecution presented testimonies from AAA, her sister BBB, and a police officer, which established a narrative of repeated abuse culminating in the formal complaint lodged in 2017.

Testimonies and Evidence

AAA testified about a specific incident on December 15, 2008, where she was held by her mother while her father raped her. Despite her fear and initial silence due to the nature of the abuse, she eventually reported the matter to her mother's sister years later, seeking justice. Conversely, BBB's testimony contradicted AAA's, claiming no wrongdoing occurred and that she was coerced into filing charges. However, the police officer corroborated AAA’s emotional recounting during the investigation, which stressed the credibility of her claims.

RTC Ruling

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) rightly convicted the accused of rape, emphasizing the strength of AAA's testimony corroborated by medical evidence. XXX and YYY were sentenced to reclusion perpetua, with additional damages awarded to AAA for the profound injury suffered. The RTC found their alibi defense unconvincing, particularly the assertion that their living situation made the commission of the crime implausible.

CA Decision

On appeal, the Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC ruling, holding that there were no discrepancies significant enough to undermine AAA's credibility. It stated that delays in reporting the incident were not uncommon in child abuse cases and affirmed that the precise date of the crime was not an essential element.

Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court ultimately upheld lower court decisions, reiterating the elements of rape as defined in Article 266-A of the Revised Penal Code. It emphasized that the moral ascendancy of the parents over AAA constituted a critical factor in the commission of the crime. The Court rejected the defense's claims of conflicting testimonies and lack of immediate reporting as irrelevant.

Legal Considerations

Significantly, the Supreme Court highlighted that the criminality of incestuous rape is compounded by the familial relationship, thus justifying the conviction under qualified circumstances of minority and parental connection. The Court articulated that conspiracy in rape cases could extend liability beyond the principal actor, hence both parents were culpable despite only the father committing the intercourse.

Penalties

The Supreme Court

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.