Title
Penaverde vs. Sandiganbayan
Case
G.R. No. L-63271
Decision Date
Aug 30, 1983
Barangay officials misused BIDA funds, falsified documents, and misappropriated funds, leading to convictions for falsification and estafa, modified by the Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 188492)

Background of the Charges

Four criminal cases were filed against the petitioners, enumerated as follows: Criminal Case No. 2135 (falsification of public document), Criminal Case Nos. 2136, 2137, and 2138 (malversation of public funds). In these cases, Penaflor Penaverde, serving as Barangay Captain, and Melecio Hermita, serving as Kagawad, allegedly falsified documents to misappropriate funds intended for the Barangay Manapao’s development projects.

Outcome of the Sandiganbayan

The Sandiganbayan found both petitioners guilty of the charges against them and articulated the specific penalties for each offense, applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law. They were sentenced to various terms of imprisonment alongside fines and restitution of the misappropriated amounts to the Barangay.

Petitioners' Claims

Following their conviction, the petitioners filed separate motions to reconsider the Sandiganbayan’s decision, arguing that the court erred in its findings. They contended that Penaflor Penaverde was not an accountable officer for the BIDA funds, as those funds were under the custody of Provincial Development Officer Adolfo Badiola, who issued checks for disbursements.

Solicitor General's Position

The Solicitor General acknowledged that the petitioners might not be accountable for malversation since Badiola held that responsibility. The claim distinguished the nature of the funds' custody, raising questions about the petitioners' criminal liability concerning malversation.

Nature of Conspiracy

Despite the admission regarding the custody of funds, the Solicitor General maintained that the petitioners engaged in conspiratorial acts leading to the inducement of another party to deliver funds under false pretenses, which aligned with the nature of their charges.

Evaluation of Conspiracy

The Sandiganbayan's conclusion that the petitioners conspired to commit the offenses was primarily based on the credibility of witness testimonies. The court's findings on witness credibility and the establishment of facts in this case are generally respected unless substantive evidence is overlooked.

Supreme Court's Finding

Upon review, the Supreme Court found

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.