Title
Supreme Court
Pastor Corpus, Jr. y Belmoro vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 255740
Decision Date
Aug 16, 2023
Pastor Corpus Jr. acquitted as slight physical injuries charge prescribed, highlighting strict adherence to crime prescription periods.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 255740)

Key Dates

• November 25, 2017 – Incident date
• January 8, 2018 – Complaint-affidavit filed
• April 30, 2018 – Prosecutor’s resolution recommending serious physical injuries
• May 21, 2018 – Information for serious physical injuries filed in court
• November 20, 2018 – MTC decision convicting for slight physical injuries
• March 20, 2019 – RTC affirmance
• April 29, 2019 – Appeal to CA filed
• March 13, 2020 – CA decision affirming conviction
• February 10, 2021 – CA denies reconsideration
• August 16, 2023 – Supreme Court decision

Applicable Law

• 1987 Constitution – Basis for due process and judicial power
• Revised Penal Code (RPC) Article 263(3) – Serious physical injuries (10-year prescription)
• RPC Article 266 – Slight physical injuries (2-month prescription; summary procedure under Rules on Summary Procedure)
• RPC Articles 89–91 – Prescription and extinction of criminal liability
• Rules of Court Rule 120, Sections 4–5 – Variance doctrine (lesser-included offenses)
• Revised Rules on Summary Procedure – Scope; tolling of prescription only by filing of Information in court

Facts

On November 25, 2017, Pastor allegedly intercepted and struck Roberto, causing a bloody nose and a fracture at the proximal end of the right fifth digit. Roberto filed a complaint-affidavit on January 8, 2018. The prosecutor upgraded the charge to serious physical injuries based on the finger fracture.

Proceedings Below

Pastor pleaded not guilty. The MTC found insufficient evidence of co-accused participation, convicted Pastor of slight physical injuries (Article 266), sentenced him to 30 days arresto menor, and awarded PhP 10,000 moral damages. The RTC and CA affirmed. Pastor argued that the lesser offense had prescribed and invoked self-defense. The CA held that prescription did not apply because the Information charged serious physical injuries.

Issues

  1. Whether Rule 45 review may reach factual questions raised by Pastor.
  2. Whether the Information for serious physical injuries tolled prescription of slight physical injuries.
  3. Whether Pastor’s conviction for slight physical injuries remains valid.

Supreme Court Ruling

The petition succeeds. Under Rule 120’s variance doctrine, conviction of a lesser-included offense is permissible. However, if that lesser offense has prescribed by Information filing, conviction is barred (Francisco v. Court of Appeals). Serious physical injuries prescribe in ten years; slight physical injuries prescribe in two months. As a summary offense in Metropolitan Manila, prescription is tolled only by filing of the Inf

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.