Title
Panagsagan vs. Panagsagan
Case
A.C. No. 7733
Decision Date
Oct 1, 2019
A lawyer was disbarred for gross immorality after abandoning his family, maintaining an illicit affair, and failing to provide support, violating professional and moral standards.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 7733)

Antecedents

Daisy and Bernie Panagsagan were married on December 18, 2000. Initially strong, their marriage deteriorated as Bernie engaged in an illicit relationship with Corazon Igtos, a fellow employee. The affair produced two children, leading to public embarrassment and distress for Daisy. Bernie vacated the conjugal home multiple times and ultimately left to live with Igtos, abandoning Daisy and their child without support. Despite these claims, Bernie countered with allegations against Daisy, suggesting she had been unfaithful and difficult to live with.

IBP Report and Recommendation

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Bar Discipline Commissioner found Bernie guilty of grossly immoral conduct due to his extramarital relationship and the violence inflicted upon Daisy. Notably, the IBP highlighted his abandonment of his family and failure to provide necessary support. Initially recommending a two-year suspension, this decision later modified the recommendation to disbarment after Daisy sought reconsideration, emphasizing the severity of Bernie's actions.

OBC Report and Recommendation

The Office of the Bar Confidant (OBC) further evaluated the case upon referral from the Court. Their report reinforced findings of Bernie’s immoral conduct stemming from his ongoing affair, violence against Daisy, and neglect of his child. The OBC concluded that these actions warranted disbarment.

Issue

The central issue is whether Atty. Bernie E. Panagsagan should be disbarred for his immoral actions and abandonment of his family.

Ruling of the Court

The Court concurred with the findings of both the IBP and OBC. It confirmed that Daisy's evidence substantiated claims of gross immorality against Bernie, which is incompatible with the moral standards required of attorneys under the Code of Professional Responsibility. The Court established that the abandonment of a spouse to cohabit with another constitutes gross immorality, amounting to criminal acts like concubinage.

Standards of Conduct

The Court referenced specific provisions from the Code of Professional Responsibility, reinforcing that lawyers must maintain good moral character throughout their careers. It clarified that to qualify for disbarment, an attorney's acts must reflect gross immorality, indicating behavior that shocks societal norms.

Evidence of Immorality

The Court noted multiple documentary evidences, including birth certificates of Bernie’s children with Igtos and photographs depicting their relationship. Despite Bernie's denials, these documents showcased his abandonment of the ethical standards expected of a lawyer.

Defense of Conversion to Islam

Bernie attempted to justify his actions by citing his conversion to Islam; however, the Court found this defense insincere. The timing of his conversion, along with inconsistencies in religious affiliation on official documents, undermined his arguments and portrayed his actions as a means of legitimizing his

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.