Title
Palada vs. Crossworld Marine Services Kapal , Ltd.
Case
G.R. No. 247778
Decision Date
Feb 17, 2021
Seafarer injured on duty; conflicting medical assessments by company and private physicians. SC ruled total and permanent disability due to lack of final assessment within 240 days, awarding full benefits.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 247778)

Antecedents

Palada was hired on May 6, 2016, and deployed on May 20, 2016, for an eight-month term on the vessel MIV Eurocargo Venezia, under an ITALIAN Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) for non-domestic seafarers. On July 11, 2016, he was involved in an accident on the vessel, resulting in injuries to his back. After initially receiving treatment, he was repatriated to the Philippines on July 18, 2016. The company-designated physician, Dr. Rodolfo P. Bergonio, initially assessed his condition but later declared him fit to work, which Palada contested, leading to further medical evaluations.

Rulings of the Panel of Voluntary Arbitrators

In a decision dated April 2, 2018, the Panel of Voluntary Arbitrators ruled in favor of Palada, determining that he was entitled to total and permanent disability benefits amounting to US$60,000, as the company-designated physician did not provide a conclusive assessment of his fitness to work within the stipulated time frames. The Arbitrators rejected the appropriateness of the fit-to-work assessment, noting that Palada had not been re-deployed and thus deemed him totally disabled.

Ruling of the Court of Appeals

The Court of Appeals (CA) subsequently reversed the decision of the Arbitrators in a ruling dated February 18, 2019, asserting that the Grade 11 disability rating given by the company’s physician was a sufficient assessment of Palada's condition. The CA held that the assessments of the company-designated physician should take precedence over those of Palada’s private physician, Dr. Manuel Fidel Magtira, as there was no third doctor to resolve the conflicting medical opinions.

Issues Raised by the Petitioner

Palada raised several legal issues, primarily arguing that the CA’s decision was an error, particularly regarding the validity of the assessments made by the company-designated physician. He contended that the ratings were not final and that he was, in fact, permanently disabled due to the absence of a definitive assessment of his condition within the appropriate periods.

Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court found merit in Palada’s petition, emphasizing that to qualify for total and permanent disability benefits, there must be adherence to the legal standards provided under the Labor Code and the employment contract. The Court highlighted that the medical assessments provided were neither complete nor definitive. The initial Grad

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.