Case Summary (G.R. No. 120344)
Background and Charges
An Information for frustrated murder was filed against Florentino Paddayuman, alleging that on March 15, 1991, he attacked and stabbed the victim, Maximo Quilang, with a bladed instrument, intending to kill him. Paddayuman was subsequently charged with attempted homicide following his arrest and arraignment where he pleaded not guilty.
Facts of the Case
The testimony of the victim revealed that while attending a wedding preparation, an altercation led to Paddayuman stabbing Quilang twice, which resulted in severe injuries. Despite claiming self-defense, Paddayuman's account was met with skepticism due to inconsistencies and lack of corroborating evidence, particularly surrounding assertions that Quilang was about to burn down his property.
Witness Testimonies and Medical Evidence
The prosecution presented witnesses, including the victim and a doctor who treated him, elucidating the injuries sustained. Medical examinations revealed two stab wounds to the chest, though the exact severity was disputed. The defense's witnesses claimed to have seen a fire, but their testimonies did not definitively link Quilang to the act of arson.
Self-Defense Claim
Paddayuman's defense rested on a claim of self-defense, necessitating proof of unlawful aggression from Quilang. However, the trial court found this assertion unconvincing, highlighting the absence of solid evidence demonstrating an imminent threat from the victim during the incident.
Trial Court Ruling
The Regional Trial Court convicted Paddayuman of attempted homicide, citing inadequate demonstration of treachery and evident premeditation as qualifying circumstances for murder, as required under the Revised Penal Code. The court imposed a penalty of imprisonment ranging from six months to two years and sentenced him to pay damages to the victim.
Appeal and Court of Appeals Decision
Paddayuman later appealed to the Court of Appeals, claiming the trial court misapprehended the evidence leading to an unjust conviction. The appellate court, however, upheld the lower court&#
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 120344)
Case Overview
- Court: Supreme Court of the Philippines
- Date: January 23, 2002
- Case Number: G.R. No. 120344
- Decision: The petition for review on certiorari was denied, affirming the lower court's conviction of the petitioner for attempted homicide.
Background of the Case
- The case originates from a criminal charge against Florentino Paddayuman for frustrated murder, later modified to attempted homicide.
- The events took place on March 15, 1991, in Tuguegarao, Cagayan, where Paddayuman allegedly stabbed Maximo Quilang during a confrontation after a drinking session.
- The initial charge included allegations of intent to kill, evident premeditation, and treachery.
Facts of the Case
- On the eve of the incident, Maximo Quilang and Florentino Paddayuman engaged in a drinking spree at the home of Casimiro Paddayuman.
- A dispute arose when Maximo admonished Florentino for excessive drinking, leading to Florentino leaving the gathering.
- At midnight, while Maximo was returning home, he was stabbed by Florentino, who claimed self-defense, asserting that Maximo had set fire to his granary and threatened him.
Testimonies Presented
- Maximo Quilang (Victim): Described the incident, including being stabbed twice and calling for help.
- Apolinario Dassil: Witnessed th