Title
Supreme Court
Pacific Ocean Manning, Inc. vs. Langam
Case
G.R. No. 246125
Decision Date
Jun 23, 2020
Seafarer injured on duty; conflicting medical opinions led to dispute over partial vs. permanent disability benefits; Supreme Court ruled for partial benefit based on company physician's assessment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 131803)

Factual Background

On May 10, 2016, Ramon S. Langam was employed as the chief cook by Pacific Ocean Manning, Inc. for the vessel "Cochrane." After undergoing a pre-employment medical examination, he was declared fit for sea duty. On January 2, 2017, while cooking, hot oil splashed into his right eye, causing immediate pain. Despite trying to wash it out and continuing with his activities, he later experienced persistent pain and blurred vision. He sought medical aid first from the ship's doctor and then in Korea, where an attending physician deemed him unfit for duty.

Following his medical repatriation on January 5, 2017, Langam pursued a post-medical evaluation, which indicated a grave prognosis from the company-designated physician, who noted that he was unlikely to regain normal vision. His requests for further evaluations and disability benefits were met with refusals from the petitioners, citing confidentiality of medical records.

Medical Consultation and Findings

Langam then sought a second opinion from independent medical experts, including Dr. Eileen Faye Enrique-Olanan and Dr. Michael Bravo, both confirming his condition of optic atrophy and his unfitness for sea service due to impaired vision. Respondents requested a third medical opinion and sought payment of disability benefits, to which petitioners objected, insisting that disability benefits were only for accidental disabilities and that his medical condition did not warrant such compensation.

Panel of Voluntary Arbitrators (PVA) Ruling

The PVA ruled in favor of Langam, indicating that the petitioners had failed to respond adequately to his requests and that their previous medical assessments were biased. The PVA awarded Langam permanent total disability benefits and attorney's fees, stating that petitioners were not forthcoming in their evaluations.

Court of Appeals (CA) Ruling

The CA upheld the PVA's decision, emphasizing the credibility of Langam's chosen medical experts. The CA reiterated that he was entitled to full disability benefits based on the inability to return to work due to the medical findings.

Supreme Court's Ruling

The petitioners contested the CA's ruling, arguing that their assessment was valid and should prevail. The Supreme Court pointed out that the key issue was whether Langam was entitled to total permanent disability benefits. It reiterated the conditions laid out in the POEA Standard Employment Contract, emphasizing workers' rights and the process for seeking disability benefits.

The Supreme Court concluded that Langam's medical issues developed during his employment and qualified for coverage under the POEA guidelines. However, it also noted that the initial assessment of Grade 7

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.