Case Summary (G.R. No. 16544)
Background Facts and Property Dispute
Antonio Osorio held one-third of the capital in Ynchausti & Co., a joint account association engaged in shipping business amounting to P500,000. Upon his death, his heirs authorized the administratrix Tomasa Osorio to present a partition project, which included the sum of P94,000 as Petrona Reyes' share in the shipping business, derived from administration proceedings approved by the Court of First Instance of Cavite in 1915. Before the estate distribution, Petrona Reyes executed a donation to her son, Leonardo Osorio, of one-half of her interest in one-third of the shipping business share, documented on February 28, 1914, and later ratified on July 3, 1915, correcting the stated source of her donation.
Nature of Donation and Heirs’ Rights
The donation from Petrona Reyes to Leonardo Osorio was supported by the valid exercise of her rights as heir and widow of Antonio Osorio, entitling her to a share in the inheritance, specifically in the Ynchausti & Co. shipping business. Despite the formal partition of the estate occurring after the initial donation, the law recognizes that heirs acquire the rights of the deceased immediately upon death (pursuant to Articles 657, 661, and 989 of the Civil Code), thus allowing Petrona Reyes to legally donate her interest even before formal partition.
Applicable Law on Donation of Future or Inheritance Property
The defense argued that the donation was void under Article 635 of the Civil Code, which prohibits donation of future property—defined as property nonexistent or not owned by the donor at the time of donation. The Court analyzed this in light of legal doctrine (citing Manresa’s commentaries) and held that inheritance property, although not yet partitioned, is not considered future property because the heirs acquire rights by operation of law immediately on the death of the decedent. As a result, Petrona Reyes legally possessed a vested right in the inheritance that she could dispose of by donation.
Legal Effect of Subsequent Ratifying Document
The July 3, 1915, document executed by Petrona Reyes merely ratified and clarified the earlier February 28, 1914, donation rather than constituting a new donation. The acceptance of the original donation by Leonardo Osorio satisfied the contractual requirement under Article 623 of the Civil Code, rendering the donation legally effective.
Ownership and Inclusion of Shares in Dispute
The main contention by the appellants was that the 610 shares of stock (valued at P61,000), representing Petrona Reyes' share in the steamer Governor Forbes, were not covered by the donation since the vessel was acquired after Antonio Osorio’s death with loans allegedly contributed individually by the heirs, not by the estate or the existing partnership. The Court found, based on evidence including depositions and admissions by the parties, that the Governor Forbes was purchased as a part of the shipping business of Ynchausti & Co., and the Osorio heirs had a one-third interest therein. The contractual guaranty signed by the heirs did not negate their participation in the business, but merely secured the loan.
Legal P
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 16544)
Factual Background and Parties Involved
- The plaintiff, Leonardo Osorio, sought to recover 610 shares of stock in the "Ynchausti Steamship Co." and their corresponding dividends, which were included in the inventory of the properties of the deceased Da. Maria Petrona Reyes.
- The estate of Da. Petrona Reyes is administered by defendant Tomasa Osorio, who along with the Ynchausti Steamship Co., are defendants and appellants in the case.
- D. Antonio Osorio, deceased father of the plaintiff and husband of Petrona Reyes, owned one-third of the capital of Ynchausti & Co., amounting to P166,666.66 of a total capital of P500,000.
- Upon D. Antonio Osorio’s death, his heirs agreed to authorize Tomasa Osorio, the administratrix of the estate, to present a project of partition.
- The partition project, consented to by the heirs and approved by the Court of First Instance of Cavite on May 10, 1915, included a sum of P94,000 attributed as Petrona Reyes’ share in the shipping business.
- On February 28, 1914, Petrona Reyes executed a donation document before a notary, giving to her son Leonardo Osorio one-half of her share in the one-third interest in Ynchausti & Co., which donation Leonardo accepted.
- On July 3, 1915, after the partition was approved, Petrona Reyes executed a correcting document ratifying the previous donation and clarifying that she ceded and donated all of her interest that was adjudicated to her.
- After D. Antonio Osorio’s death but before estate distribution, Ynchausti & Co. purchased the steamer Governor Forbes; it was agreed that Petrona Reyes’ share in the vessel was valued at P61,000, equivalent to 610 shares in the corporation.
- The shares were deposited with Ynchausti & Co. pending resolution of ownership between the heirs and the plaintiff.
- The plaintiff alleged ownership by virtue of the donation; the defendant claimed those shares were not included in the donation and belonged to Reyes’ heirs.
Trial Court Decision and Appeal Issues
- The trial court ruled that the 610 shares and their dividends belonged to the plaintiff.
- It ordered Tomasa Osorio, as administratrix, to exclude these shares from the inventory and accounts of Petrona Reyes’ estate.
- Ynchausti Steamship Co. was ordered to register the shares in Leonardo Osorio’s name and deliver dividends accordingly.
- The court denied the defendant’s counterclaim for P45,000, holding that these represented dividends related to the P94,000 adjudicated to Petrona Reyes and donated by her to Leonardo Osorio.
- Upon appeal, the defendant-appellant contended:
- The donation by Petrona Reyes to Leonardo Osorio was invalid, lacking legal value.
- Even assuming the donation was valid, the 610 shares valued at P61,000 were not included in the donation.