Title
Ocampo III vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 156547-51
Decision Date
Feb 4, 2008
Tarlac governor Ocampo and LTFI director Flores were acquitted of malversation as NALGU funds, loaned to LTFI, became private; MOA was ratified by Sangguniang Panlalawigan.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 162025)

Summary of Facts

The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) allocated a total of P100 million, called National Aid for Local Government Units (NALGU), to Tarlac Province for decentralization initiatives during President Corazon C. Aquino's term. Governor Ocampo, during his tenure from February 22, 1988, to June 30, 1992, lent out P56.6 million to LTFI for livelihood projects under a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed on August 8, 1988. Notably, Ocampo had resigned from LTFI before this agreement.

Legal Proceedings

The Sandiganbayan's March 8, 2002 Decision declared both petitioners guilty of malversation in two criminal cases (Crim. Case Nos. 16794 and 16795) based on their misuse of public funds associated with the NALGU allocation. The cases stemmed from the irregularities in the management and accounting of the NALGU funds, particularly concerning the loaned amount to LTFI and related expenditures.

Criminal Charges

Crim. Case No. 16794 involved claims that Ocampo, as Governor, misused P8,860,000 intended for embroidery machines, alleging that a balance of P1,180,496.48 was unaccounted for after the funds were improperly utilized. Crim. Case No. 16795 alleged that Ocampo and Flores withdrew P58,000 from LTFI's bank account, again claiming misappropriation of funds without proper expenditure records.

Evidence and Audit Findings

The prosecution's case largely hinged on a Commission on Audit report, which traced the financial flow related to the NALGU funds. The audit detailed substantial discrepancies in LTFI’s financial transactions related to funds earmarked for the embroidery machines, with substantial amounts unaccounted for or misappropriated.

Sandiganbayan's Findings

The Sandiganbayan asserted that Ocampo’s failure to establish adequate safeguards for funds, as mandated by law, constituted gross negligence, rendering him liable for malversation, even in the absence of direct monetary misappropriation. It held that the mere fact of negligence permitted others (Flores) to misappropriate funds. Flores was found liable for his direct involvement in the management of the funds.

Petitioners’ Defense

The defense posited that the funds became private upon loaning to LTFI, arguing that ownership transferred to LTFI, thus removing the public nature of the funds and exempting them from malversation. Ocampo contended he had resigned from LTFI prior to the loans and therefore should not be held accountable for LTFI's subsequent transactions, while Flores claimed he acted appropriately in managing the funds.

Resolution of the Supreme Court

Upon appeal, the Supreme Court concurred with the petitioners' arguments, emphasizing that the nature of the transacti

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.