Title
Obusan vs. Obusan Jr.
Case
Adm. Case. No. 1392
Decision Date
Apr 2, 1984
Lawyer disbarred for abandoning lawful wife, cohabiting with a married woman, deemed grossly immoral, eroding legal profession's ethical standards.
A

Case Summary (Adm. Case. No. 1392)

Procedural Posture

The disbarment complaint was filed in 1974 by the respondent’s wife. The Office of the Solicitor General investigated and filed the case for disbarment. The respondent did not answer the complaint, waived the presentation of additional evidence, and his counsel did not file a memorandum. The case was resolved after examination of the record by the Court.

Factual Background

While employed at the Peoples Homesite and Housing Corporation in 1967, respondent became acquainted with Natividad Estabillo, who represented herself as a widow. Respondent and Natividad engaged in carnal relations, and a son, John (Jun‑Jun), was born on November 27, 1972. Four days after the child’s birth (December 1, 1972), respondent married Preciosa in a civil ceremony; a religious ceremony ratifying the marriage occurred on December 30, 1972. The newly married couple resided with the wife’s mother at 993 Sto. Cristo Street, Tondo, Manila, for more than one year.

Abandonment and Discovery of Cohabitation

On the evening of April 13, 1974, respondent asked his mother‑in‑law for permission to leave and go on vacation to his hometown in Daet, Camarines Norte, and never returned to the conjugal home. Petitioner investigated and discovered respondent living and cohabiting with Natividad at an apartment, 85‑A Felix Manalo Street, Cubao, Quezon City. Evidence of cohabitation included testimony and affidavits from the maid, laundress, and plumber (Exhs. A, B, F), testimony of the pook leader who said respondent introduced himself as head of the family and whose name appeared on the barangay list (Exhs. E, G, H), and identification by the apartment owner of photographs showing respondent (Exhs. I–I‑D). The presence of respondent’s car at that apartment further corroborated the cohabitation.

Respondent’s Defense

Respondent asserted that his relationship with Natividad terminated upon his marriage to Preciosa and admitted only occasional visits to 85‑A Felix Manalo Street to give financial assistance to his son Jun‑Jun. Rogelio Panotes corroborated that testimony. Respondent denied residing with Natividad and claimed to live with his sister in Cypress Village, San Francisco del Monte, Quezon City. He accused the maid, laundress, and plumber of being paid witnesses. He also explained his departure from the conjugal home as compelled by his wife’s alleged nagging, violent quarrels, absences from the home, and interference with his professional obligations.

Evidentiary and Investigative Findings

The Court found that the petitioner sustained the burden of proof. Respondent neither answered the complaint nor offered additional evidence to rebut the petitioner’s proofs. The affidavits and testimony of neighbors and household personnel, the pook leader’s testimony and barangay listing, and the apartment owner’s photographic identifications were credited by the Court as corroborative evidence of abandonment and cohabitation.

Legal Conclusions and Reasoning

The Court concluded that respondent abandoned his wife and resumed carnal relations with a former paramour who

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.