Title
Northwest Airlines vs. Laya
Case
G.R. No. 145956
Decision Date
May 29, 2002
Dr. Laya, a first-class passenger, was subjected to humiliating security checks by NWA personnel, leading to a legal battle over damages. Courts ruled in his favor, awarding reduced damages for mental anguish and exemplary purposes.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 145956)

Summary of Facts

On May 3, 1991, Dr. Laya, a frequent flyer and member of NWA's World Perks Club, underwent a security procedure where his Samsonite attaché case was subjected to further inspection at an airport check-in counter. Unlike other passengers, Dr. Laya's case was placed in a garbage bag, and he was given two paper envelopes that proved inadequate for his belongings. Upon requesting to speak with a manager about his treatment, he was told by an NWA assistant manager that the same rules applied to everyone, regardless of status. Following this incident, Dr. Laya complained about the rude behavior of the employees, but NWA's response was unsatisfactory, leading to a demand for indemnity which was rejected.

Legal Proceedings

After the initial complaint, Dr. Laya filed a suit for damages in the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City. The trial court ruled in favor of Dr. Laya, awarding him moral damages of P1 million, exemplary damages of P500,000, and attorney’s fees of P50,000. Both parties appealed the decision; NWA disputed the ruling, while Dr. Laya sought increased damages. The Court of Appeals modified the awards, reducing moral damages to P500,000 and exemplary damages to P250,000, affirming the trial court’s decision on attorney’s fees.

Issues Raised

NWA’s appeal to the Supreme Court included claims that the Court of Appeals erred in awarding damages based on findings related to the alleged rudeness of its personnel. NWA asserted that its actions were based on the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Security Directive No. 91-11, which mandated strict security measures that the airline was obligated to follow.

Court's Findings on Security Procedures

The Supreme Court found that Dr. Laya was not uniquely targeted by NWA employees as multiple passengers, regardless of race or status, were subjected to additional security inspections. The FAA directive required heightened scrutiny of specific types of briefcases, which justified the airline's protocols. Hence, the airline’s actions, although potentially inconvenient and poorly executed, complied with a security directive aimed at preventing terrorist threats.

Assessment of Damages

The Court acknowledged Dr. Laya faced humiliation and mental anguish due to the treatment he received but stated that damages serve not to enrich but to compensate for the suffering

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.