Title
NFD International Manning Agents, Inc. vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 107131
Decision Date
Mar 13, 1997
Romel Bearneza, a seafarer, sustained injuries during employment, leading to epilepsy and later Schizophreniform Disorder. The NLRC and Supreme Court ruled in his favor, granting US$30,000 in disability benefits, affirming the condition's link to his employment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 107131)

Procedural Background

The case originated from a petition for certiorari filed by NFD International Manning Agents, Inc. against the NLRC's decision which overturned the Philippine Overseas Employment Agency's (POEA) initial ruling that denied Bearneza's claim for permanent total disability benefits. The NLRC had ruled in favor of Bearneza, granting him benefits worth $30,000 for his disabilities.

Factual Findings

Bearneza's employment commenced on February 15, 1985, as a wiper on board M/S Wilnina, for a ten-month contract. He suffered a physical assault on November 8, 1985, resulting in facial contusions and lumbar injuries, leading to a diagnosis of suspected epilepsy. Although he was initially declared fit for work on February 3, 1986, he was later confined for a lengthy period from September 25, 1986, where he was diagnosed with Schizophreniform Disorder, classified as a permanent total disability.

Medical Evidence and Evaluations

Bearneza presented substantial evidence, including medical certificates from various doctors outlining his health status over time. Despite undergoing treatment and being initially cleared to work, subsequent medical evaluations revealed a progressive mental health condition linked to the initial injuries sustained during his employment. The underlying issue of whether these mental health problems stemmed from his previous injuries or developed independently was central to the case.

POEA's Ruling

The POEA concluded that Bearneza was not entitled to benefits, arguing that the disability diagnosed in September 1986 (Schizophreniform Disorder) occurred significantly after the initial declaration of fitness for work, arguing that such a condition was not caused by his epilepsy. The POEA distinguished between epilepsy and Schizophreniform Disorder, thereby linking the latter to a separate etiology.

NLRC's Ruling and Justification

In contrast, the NLRC acknowledged the complexity of Bearneza’s mental health situation. They determined that the findings of fitness to work did not necessarily negate the subsequent and later-developing Schizophreniform Disorder, which may indeed have arisen from his previous health issues caused by the assault. The NLRC emphasized the absence of definitive evidence from the petitioner that ruled out the relationship between the disabilities, thus concluding that Bearneza's condition qualifies him as permanently disabled.

Legal Principles Applied

The Supreme Court referenced the judgments from the NLRC's decision to reinforce the understanding of permanent total disability. A crucial assertion made was that the incapacity to earn a livelihood due to an ailment occurring during or linked to employment conditions is sufficient for compensation elig

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.