Title
National Power Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 65882-84
Decision Date
Apr 15, 1988
A labor dispute between NPC and NPCEWA led to attorney fee claims; Supreme Court ruled NLRC's partial execution premature pending NPC's appeal.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 166408)

Applicable Law

The relevant constitutional framework for this case is based on the provisions set forth in the 1987 Philippine Constitution, as the decision date falls in 1988. The enforceability of the agreements and obligations concerning attorney’s fees is guided by the labor laws and principles of contract law applicable in the Philippines.

Background and Proceedings

The dispute originated on January 11, 1966, when NPCEWA initiated a strike against NPC, accusing it of failing to honor their collective bargaining agreement. This conflict was bifurcated into multiple related cases, ultimately leading to a resolution in the form of a Supplemental Agreement on July 9, 1973, which led to the withdrawal of all pending labor cases between the parties.

Validity of the Agreement and Attorney's Fees Issue

On March 1, 1979, the Supreme Court validated this Supplemental Agreement and authorized the withdrawal of previous labor cases. However, Attorney Simplicio J. Balcos, the former counsel for NPCEWA, contested the validity of the agreement, arguing that his claim for attorney's fees should not be barred by this resolution. The court directed the Secretary of Labor to determine the reasonable fees owed to Atty. Balcos, signaling that inquiries about the fees would continue.

Motion for Remittance and Dismissal of Claims

On September 5, 1979, Atty. Manansala, who had taken over as counsel for NPCEWA, filed a motion for the remittance of attorney’s fees. NPC moved to dismiss the motion, asserting it had already paid Atty. Manansala P10,000 and argued it held no further funds in trust. However, the Labor Arbiter denied this dismissal, maintaining that NPC, in its role as trustee, had an obligation to deliver remaining fees to Atty. Manansala.

Arbitration Orders and Execution Proceedings

Subsequent proceedings to execute the order for the partial remittance were impeded when a writ issued on December 3, 1979, was unsatisfied due to a refusal by the Commission on Audit to process a check NPC issued. This led to the levying of NPC’s deposits in February 1980 to satisfy the claims.

Calculations of Attorney's Fees

A detailed calculation revealed NPCEWA obtained various benefits totaling P12,774,000 as a result of the negotiations led by Atty. Manansala. During hearings, despite NPC’s absences, analysts reported the trust funds held by NPC amounted to P33,450.18. On May 14, 1980, the Labor Arbiter ordered NPC to remit P1,267,400 as attorney's fees, minus the previously paid P10,000.

Appeals Process and Final Decisions

NPC appealed against multiple NLRC ord

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.