Title
National Power Corp. vs. Heirs of Ramoran
Case
G.R. No. 193455
Decision Date
Jun 13, 2016
NPC expropriated 91,212 sqm for a power plant, disputed just compensation. SC ruled 12% interest from 1995-2013, then 6% until full payment, citing delay and BSP Circular No. 799.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 193455)

Applicable Law

The governing law in this case includes Republic Act (R.A.) No. 6395, which established the NPC, alongside provisions governing eminent domain and just compensation under the 1987 Philippine Constitution. Additionally, recent regulations from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas regarding interest rates apply to the resolution of monetary compensation issues.

Facts of the Case

On February 10, 1995, NPC filed a complaint for the expropriation of 67,984 square meters of land covered by Original Certificate of Title No. P-8665, which is registered under the name of Gregoria Ramoran, as part of its Sual Coal-Fired Thermal Power Plant project. Subsequently, a notice of taking possession was issued, and a deposit of ₱2,030 was made as the assessed value of the property. Procedural motions for intervention were filed by the intervenors, asserting their claims over the property. However, it was subsequently established that the actual area of the land was 91,212 square meters. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) ruled for just compensation at ₱10 per square meter.

Procedural History

The trial court established the compensation amount of ₱10 per square meter for the entire area involved. A partial compromise agreement was executed in 2000, addressing the compensation for the initially claimed area of 67,984 square meters. The RTC later ordered payment for the remaining unclaimed portion of 23,228 square meters, including interest at 12% per annum from February 10, 1995, until full payment.

Issues Raised

The central issue contested by NPC was whether the legal interest on the compensation provided should be set at 6% instead of 12%, as found by the lower courts. NPC contended that the nature of the expropriation did not equate to a loan or forbearance of money, and therefore the lower interest should apply.

Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court upheld the RTC and Court of Appeals' decision, affirming the imposition of 12% interest on just compensation from the date of possession (March 2, 1995) until June 30, 2013, followed by a reduction to 6% thereafter in line with the Monetary Board’s Circular. The Court established that, based on established jurisprudence, the nature of the transacti

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.