Title
National Power Corporation vs. Gutierrez
Case
G.R. No. 60077
Decision Date
Jan 18, 1991
NPC required to pay just compensation for land easements used in transmission lines, affirming P5.00/sq.m as fair market value.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 190795)

Appointment and Reports of Commissioners

To determine “just and reasonable” compensation, the trial court appointed three commissioners who conducted inspections and hearings. Their recommendations varied widely:
– NPC’s commissioner proposed an easement fee of ₱1.00 per sq m.
– Respondents’ commissioner recommended ₱10.00 per sq m (₱7,600 total).
– Court’s commissioner suggested ₱5.00 per sq m.

Trial Court Ruling and Reconsideration

The court initially adopted respondents’ valuation, awarding ₱10.00 per sq m plus ₱800 attorney’s fees. On NPC’s motion for reconsideration, the court reclassified the land as partly commercial and partly agricultural, reduced the award to ₱5.00 per sq m (₱3,800 total), and set aside attorney’s fees.

Court of Appeals’ Determination

NPC appealed, arguing that only a simple easement fee—limited to nominal payment—was due, since full ownership remained with respondents. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court, holding that the perpetual restrictions on land use, safety hazards beneath high‐tension lines, and respondents’ ongoing tax burden constituted a taking under eminent domain requiring full compensation.

Issue on Review

Whether NPC’s acquisition of a right‐of‐way easement for transmission lines constitutes an exercise of the power of eminent domain that entitles landowners to just (full market) compensation, or merely a simple easement fee.

Supreme Court Analysis

  1. Power of Eminent Domain and Easements
    – Under Commonwealth Act No. 120 and the 1987 Constitution, NPC may invoke eminent domain to impose a permanent burden (easement) without transferring title.
    – The imposition of restrictions (e.g., height limitations, safety risks, permanent tax liability) effectively deprives owners of ordinary use, satisfying the definition of a “taking.”

  2. Just Compensation Standard
    – Just compensation equals the full and complete monetary equivalent of the loss sustained (Art. III, Sec. 9).
    – Market value at the time of taking is the primary criterion.

  3. Application to the Present Case
    – Respondents presented evidence of higher market value (₱50.00 per sq m) given the parcel’s proximity to major highways.
    – The trial court’s award of ₱5.00 per sq m was s

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.