Title
Supreme Court
NAPOLCOM vs. Bernabe
Case
G.R. No. 129914
Decision Date
May 12, 2000
Police Chief Inspector Bernabe accused of leading a payroll syndicate; dismissed after investigation. Supreme Court upheld dismissal, citing due process compliance.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 129914)

Facts of the Case

The pivotal incident occurred on March 3, 1993, when a newspaper article accused Bernabe of leading a syndicate that encashed treasury warrants of deceased or absent personnel from the Philippine Constabulary (PC) and the Integrated National Police (INP). The article prompted President Fidel V. Ramos to instruct an investigation into Bernabe’s activities. Consequently, the Secretary of the Interior referred the case to the PNP, which initiated an investigation through the Criminal Investigation Service Command (CISC).

Investigation and Allegations

Upon his notification of the allegations, Bernabe was ordered to submit an affidavit explaining his side. He contended in his affidavit that most of the allegations were either dismissed or still pending resolution, except for one pending case involving seven treasury warrants. Detailed investigations revealed Bernabe was previously charged with multiple counts of estafa through falsification of documents related to encashing treasury warrants from personnel classified as AWOL or deceased. This led to a suspension of Bernabe from police service, followed by formal charges against him.

Summary Dismissal Proceedings

On April 26, 1993, a Summary Dismissal Hearing Officer recommended Bernabe’s dismissal, which was subsequently concurred by the PNP Inspector General. On July 20, 1993, the Chief of the PNP formally dismissed Bernabe, citing extensive evidence of his involvement in financial misconduct and the acquisition of unexplained wealth.

Appeal to NAPOLCOM

Bernabe appealed his dismissal to the NAPOLCOM’s National Appellate Board, which later affirmed his dismissal in October 1994. In response to another motion for reconsideration, the Board maintained its decision in February 1995. Bernabe subsequently filed a petition for review with the Court of Appeals challenging his dismissal based on allegations of lack of due process and questioning the constitutionality of the law under which he was dismissed.

Court of Appeals’ Decision

The Court of Appeals, on March 13, 1997, ruled in favor of Bernabe regarding the due process issue, asserting that the dismissal proceedings failed to comply with the legal requirements. The court upheld the constitutionality of the relevant statute but set aside the decision of the National Appellate Board, ordered Bernabe’s reinstatement, and mandated the PNP to settle the withheld salary and allowances.

Supreme Court Decision

The petitioners challenged the Court of Appeals' ruling to the Supreme Court, asserting that their procedures

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.