Title
Municipality of Taguig vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 142619
Decision Date
Sep 13, 2005
Municipality of Taguig and Barangay Hagonoy dispute ownership of Hagonoy Multi-Purpose Hall; petitioners commit forum shopping by filing two CA petitions, leading to dismissal by SC.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 207816)

Procedural Background

On December 8, 1999, Barangay Hagonoy initiated legal action by filing a complaint with the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Pasig against the petitioners for damages, coupled with a request for a temporary restraining order (TRO) to prevent the petitioners from regaining control of the multi-purpose hall. The RTC, under Judge Rodolfo Bonifacio, issued an initial 72-hour TRO, later extended to 20 days. This led the petitioners to file a certiorari petition before the Court of Appeals (CA) against the RTC orders concerning the TRO.

The Court of Appeals' Decision

The CA found that the second petition filed by the petitioners constituted forum shopping, as it was pursued while the first petition was pending before a different division of the CA. On February 2, 2000, the CA dismissed the second petition for violating the rule against forum shopping, holding that both petitions sought the same relief, namely, to prevent enforcement of the RTC's injunction concerning the multi-purpose hall.

Interpretation of Forum Shopping

The CA's ruling elaborated on the legal definition of forum shopping, stating it occurs when a party seeks to obtain a favorable outcome from different courts or administrative bodies concerning the same issues or cause of action. It cited established jurisprudence confirming that actions based on the same relief sought from different forums can lead to conflict and confusion, hence the necessity of a firm stance against such practices.

Petitioners' Arguments

In their appeal, petitioners asserted there was no forum shopping as they claimed that the second petition arose from the motion to withdraw the first. They further contended that the two petitions addressed different orders from the RTC, and thus did not fall into the category of forum shopping. However, the CA rejected these arguments, emphasizing that despite questioning distinct orders, the ultimate aim in both petitions was identical, thereby making them subject to the same forum shopping objections.

Legal Standards and Precedents

The CA referenced several jurisprudential standards for identifying forum shopping, including the principles outlined in First Philippine International Bank vs. Court of Appeals and Buan vs. Lopez, which highlighted the necessity of evaluating whether two pending actions involve the same parties, cause of action, and relief sought. These precedents underscored the importance of consistency and integrity in judicial proceedin

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.