Title
Municipality of Cardona vs. Municipality of Bigo
Case
G.R. No. 10202
Decision Date
Mar 27, 1917
Philippine government challenged Act No. 1748's delegation of boundary-adjustment powers to the Governor-General; court upheld the law, ruling it did not violate legislative authority under the Act of Congress.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 124360)

Case Background

The plaintiff amended its original complaint after a demurrer was sustained, indicating that no new facts had been introduced and the essential points remained unchanged. The demurrer was once again raised against the amended complaint, leading the court to reaffirm the lack of substantial alterations that would merit a different conclusion.

Legal Contention

The crux of the plaintiff’s argument rests on the assertion that Section 1 of Act No. 1748 violates the Act of Congress dated July 1, 1902. The plaintiff contends that this section improperly delegates legislative powers to the Governor-General, whereas the Act of Congress assigns such powers explicitly to the Philippine Legislature. The section in question allows the Governor-General to alter provincial, municipal, and other local political boundaries at his discretion, including the establishment and appointment of officials in newly created subdivisions.

Court's Findings

The court concluded that the delegation of power to the Governor-General, as stipulated in the Act, does not equate to an abdication of legislative authority by the Philippine Legislature. Instead, it is viewed as a necessary delegation of specific details concerning local governance that require swift and efficient decision-making. This is particularly pertinent in the context of evolving political subdivisions that are subject to rapid demographic changes.

Conclusion of the

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.