Title
Supreme Court
Mortel vs. KASSCO, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 137823
Decision Date
Dec 15, 2000
KASSCO failed to secure CCT for condominium unit sold to Mortel, leading to disputes; SC ruled contract to sell void due to unfulfilled condition, denying Mortel's claims for rescission and damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 137823)

Applicable Law

This case is governed by the 1987 Philippine Constitution and relevant provisions of the Civil Code, including the laws pertaining to contracts, sale of real estate on installment, and the Condominium Law (Republic Act No. 4726 and Presidential Decree No. 957).

Background of the Dispute

While KASSCO, Inc. was the registered owner of the Kassco Building and had mortgaged the property to secure a loan from PNB, it sought to convert the building into a condominium. In 1985, KASSCO, represented by Oscar Santos, entered into an agreement with Reynaldo Mortel for the sale of the second floor of the building. This agreement included stipulations regarding the securing of a Condominium Certificate of Title (CCT) and the execution of a deed of sale upon securing the title. The arrangement involved a lease agreement allowing Mortel to occupy the premises pending the fulfillment of these conditions.

Lease and Sale Agreements

The initial agreement between the parties anticipated the delivery of the CCT, with the sale contingent upon this event. In the event of non-fulfillment of the conditions, including failure to obtain approval from PNB for the release of the mortgage, the lease stipulated provisions for extensions or options for Mortel regarding the purchase of the property.

Legal Proceedings and Claims

As KASSCO failed to secure the necessary approvals and the one-year lease expired, Mortel demanded the execution of the Deed of Absolute Sale. This led to KASSCO filing an unlawful detainer complaint against him. Mortel countered with a suit for specific performance or rescission of the contract. The Regional Trial Court dismissed Mortel's complaint, a ruling that was later affirmed by the Court of Appeals.

Findings on Contractual Obligations

The Supreme Court held that the agreements constituted not just a contract of sale but also a lease, thereby requiring the fulfillment of specific conditions for the sale to take effect. The Court emphasized that the obligation to secure the CCT was a suspensive condition; therefore, the absence of such a title rendered the contract to sell ineffective.

Implications of the Mortgage

KASSCO's failure to obtain a partial cancellation of its mortgage with PNB was a significant factor inhibiting the effectiveness of the contract. The non-fulfillment of this condition meant that the specific provisions related to the Condominium Law were not applicable, as those laws presuppose the existence of a valid contract to sell which linked to a secure title.

Allegations of Bad Faith and Misrepresentation

Mortel alleged that KASSCO, Inc. misled him regardin

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.