Title
Morales vs. Lotuaco
Case
Adm. Matter No. P-2357
Decision Date
Jun 19, 1982
Morales accused Lotuaco and Alonzo of sexual assault; testimony deemed unreliable due inconsistencies; Lotuaco reprimanded for fornication.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 161834)

Allegations and Sequence of Events

Rosalinda alleged that on January 2, 1979, she was forcibly taken by Lotuaco, Alonzo, and an accomplice, Marianita Batac, to the O'Patso Restaurant, where Lotuaco sexually assaulted her. This event was followed by a second assault approximately five days later at the Sawali Restaurant, where again Lotuaco allegedly raped her. Rosalinda claimed that both assaults occurred under coercive circumstances involving force and intimidation.

Responses from Respondents

Both Lotuaco and Alonzo denied the charges against them in their respective comments submitted to the court. They indicated that a parallel criminal complaint for rape had been lodged against them, but it was dismissed for lack of evidence on December 20, 1979. Notably, Alonzo passed away on May 16, 1981, leaving Lotuaco as the sole respondent.

Findings from the Investigation

Judge Bienvenido C. Vera Cruz conducted a formal investigation and gathered testimonies, particularly from Rosalinda. She reported that she was compelled to accompany her friend Marianita to meet with Lotuaco, leading to the mentioned incidents. The testimonies presented considerable contradictions and raised questions about Rosalinda's credibility.

Credibility and Evidence Evaluation

The evaluation highlighted significant inconsistencies in Rosalinda's account, including her initial claims of coercion contrasted with statements suggesting consent. The investigation noted her lack of immediate complaint to authorities or visible signs of struggle, which further undermined her narrative of intimidation and fear during the alleged assaults.

Dismissal of Criminal Allegations

Judge Vera Cruz concluded that Rosalinda failed to provide sufficient credible evidence to substantiate her claims, leading to recommendations for case dismissal. Specifically, he highlighted that no force or weapon was evidently used and that the allegations were not corroborated by any immediate complaint or physical evidence typically associated wit

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.