Title
Midgely vs. Ferandos
Case
G.R. No. L-34314
Decision Date
May 13, 1975
A British petitioner contests jurisdiction and extraterritorial summons in a Philippine property dispute involving inheritance claims, contested civil status, and contempt allegations.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 6589)

Jurisdictional Claims

The petition filed by Sofia Pastor de Midgely challenges Respondent Judge Ferandos’ order dated May 8, 1971, which denied her motion to dismiss based on a purported lack of jurisdiction and citation of article 222 of the Civil Code. Midgely argues that the Cebu court lacks jurisdiction over her person and properties, and she seeks dismissal of a complaint filed against her (Civil Case No. 274-T).

Background of the Estate and Proceedings

Alvaro Pastor, Sr., a Spanish national, owned properties and mining claims in Cebu. Upon his death on June 5, 1966, he left a will that purportedly bequeathed a share of his estate to Lewelyn Barlito Quemada, who claims to be his illegitimate child. In 1970, Quemada initiated proceedings to probate the will, and subsequently filed a complaint against Midgely and other parties to settle ownership issues related to the estate. This involved extraterritorial service of summons aimed at parties residing in Spain.

Service of Summons and Responses

Quemada executed extraterritorial service through the Philippine Embassy in Spain, which was acknowledged by Midgely and her brother, Alvaro Pastor, Jr., but they contested the jurisdiction of the Cebu court. Midgely’s response included a special appearance to address the jurisdiction issue and highlighted the lack of efforts for compromise as stipulated by article 222 of the Civil Code.

Denial of Motion to Dismiss

Judge Ferandos ruled against Midgely's motion to dismiss, asserting proper service of summons and arguing that article 222 was irrelevant since the case involved civil status. Midgely's subsequent motion for reconsideration was denied, reaffirming her obligation to respond to the complaint as the case was characterized as concerning real properties and rights.

Certification of Proceedings and Contempt Charges

As proceedings unfolded, a writ of preliminary injunction was issued by a higher court, suspending all actions in the related Civil Case No. 274-T. However, claims of contempt were raised by Midgely against Quemada for allegedly ignoring the injunction by taking possession of properties and seeking payments. The court found no merit in these contempt charges, concluding that Quemada’s actions were within his rights as an administrator.

Analysis of Jurisdictional Issues

The crux of the legal analysis pertains to the validity of Judge Ferandos’ jurisdiction over Midgely given her special appearance and motion to dismiss. The court found that Midgely’s actions in contesting jurisdiction while simultaneously addressing other procedural issues amounted to a waiver of her claim of non-jurisdiction.

Conclusion

The court determined that Midgely’s claims of im

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.