Title
Merritt vs. Government of the Philippine Islands
Case
G.R. No. 11154
Decision Date
Mar 21, 1916
Motorcyclist Merritt collided with a negligently driven government ambulance, sustaining severe injuries. Court ruled government not liable for driver’s negligence despite waived immunity.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 11154)

Key Dates

Date of Accident: March 25, 1913
Enactment of Suit Authorization: February 3, 1915 (Act No. 2457)
Decision Date: March 21, 1916

Trial Court Findings of Fact

• Merritt rode his motorcycle westward on Padre Faura at 10–12 mph.
• The hospital ambulance, instead of keeping right on Taft Avenue and sounding a horn, turned suddenly into Merritt’s path ten feet from the intersection, striking him.
• Merritt sustained severe skull fractures, brain injury, a compound fracture of the right leg, and resulting permanent physical and mental impairments.
• Medical testimony established unconsciousness, risk of death, leg contraction, sensory deficits, and diminished mental acuity.
• Merchants corroborated Merritt’s pre-accident prowess as a contractor and post-accident loss of at least 50 percent of his earning capacity.
• Merritt dissolved a partnership and relinquished a building contract due to his disabilities.

Trial Court Award and Claims on Appeal

The trial court awarded P 14,741, comprising:

  1. General damages for permanent injuries: P 5,000 (plaintiff claimed P 25,000)
  2. Lost wages for 2 months 21 days at P 1,000/month: P 2,666 (plaintiff claimed P 6,000)
    Merritt appealed both damage limits; the Government appealed liability and total award.

Appellate Court Analysis on Damages

– Permanent Injuries: Court found no basis to increase the P 5,000 award.
– Lost Earnings: Evidence proved total incapacity for six months; confinement in hospital for only 2 months 21 days did not limit recovery.
– Revised Damages: Monthly earnings of P 1,000 × 6 months = P 6,000; combined with other items, total damages recalculated to P 18,075.

Appellate Court Analysis on Government Liability

– Consent to Suit: Act No. 2457 waived immunity but did not by its terms admit liability or create a new cause of action; it merely authorized Merritt to litigate preexisting claims.
– Principle from U.S. and Spanish jurisprudence: A sovereign’s consent to be sued furnishes a remedy but does not itself establish liability.
– Civil Code (Art. 1903, ¶ 5): The State is liable only for acts of “special agents” acting under a defin

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.