Title
Marohombsar vs. Alonto, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 93711
Decision Date
Feb 25, 1991
Dr. Marohombsar’s permanent appointment as Acting Vice-Chancellor was unlawfully revoked without cause, violating her security of tenure; SC ruled in her favor, upholding her position.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 93711)

Background and Appointments

On March 22, 1988, Dr. Marohombsar was designated as Officer-in-Charge of the Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs while concurrently holding the position of Vice-President for External Studies. This dual role transitioned on January 2, 1989, when her previous position merged into the responsibilities of the Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs, leading to her formal appointment as Acting Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs, which was approved by the MSU Board of Regents on May 16, 1989.

Actions Leading to the Dispute

On May 14, 1990, MSU President Ahmad E. Alonto attempted to reassign Dr. Marohombsar to a newly created position as Vice-President for Academic Affairs, which she rejected, citing ongoing commitments in her current role. Subsequently, on May 16, 1990, the President appointed Professor Macacuna Moslem as Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs, who did not accept the position. Following this, on May 28, 1990, Corazon Batara was designated as Officer-in-Charge of the Office.

Legal Contention

Dr. Marohombsar challenged her removal, contending that her position was permanent, thus rendering any termination without cause illicit under applicable laws. She cited Resolution No. 59, S. 1989, which endorsed her appointment as Acting Vice-Chancellor effective until revoked by appropriate authority—implying the Board of Regents' role in such actions.

Nature of the Appointment

The Court recognized that while acting appointments possess a temporary character and can typically be revoked without cause, the unique circumstances of Dr. Marohombsar's tenure necessitated a closer examination. Despite being designated as an acting official, the context of her appointment and the associated implications of her long-term commitment to the university indicated a potential violation of the security of tenure principles enshrined in the Constitution and Civil Service Law.

Examination of Process

The Court examined the relevance of the MSU Code of Governance, which mandates that any designation by the MSU President must be reported to the Board of Regents within a stipulated timeframe to ensure such designation is valid. The principle of security of tenure would not allow positions to be capriciously and indefinitely transformed from permanent to temporary by administrative maneuvering.

Respondent's Arguments and Court's Findings

The respondents argued that Dr. Marohombsar’s continuous permanent appointment as a professor negated the permanence of her administrative role as Vice-Chancellor. However, the Court refuted this by emphasizing established precedents, indicating that administrative positions such as deans and directors cannot be unconstitutionally restricted in tenure.

Court's Decision

In light of these findings, the Court grant

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.