Title
Mariano vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 178145
Decision Date
Jul 7, 2014
Driver convicted of reckless imprudence causing serious injuries after overtaking and bumping another vehicle; penalty modified to two months' arresto mayor, with damages upheld.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 139603)

Facts and Circumstances of the Incident

On the evening of September 12, 1999, Ferdinand de Leon was driving his jeepney in Barangay Engkanto, Angat, Bulacan with his family. Reynaldo Mariano was driving a red Toyota pick-up truck in the same vicinity. The petitioner overtook Ferdinand’s jeep, almost causing a collision. Ferdinand then blocked the path of Mariano’s vehicle, had a verbal altercation with him, which eventually de-escalated. After parting ways, Ferdinand parked his jeep outside his mother’s house and alighted. He was subsequently struck by Mariano’s overtaking pick-up, causing severe injuries which required prolonged hospitalization and medical treatment. Mariano surrendered at the police camp after the incident.


Lower Courts’ Rulings on Liability and Penalty

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) convicted Mariano of frustrated homicide, citing the presence of evident premeditation, treachery, and abuse of superior strength, and sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment under Article 249 of the RPC, along with damages. On appeal, the Court of Appeals (CA) reclassified the offense as reckless imprudence resulting in serious physical injuries under Article 365 of the RPC and reduced the penalty and damages imposed.


Supreme Court’s Affirmation of Liability for Reckless Imprudence

The Supreme Court upheld the CA’s finding that Mariano was guilty of reckless imprudence resulting in serious physical injuries. The petitioner's claim of the incident being an accident and the absence of criminal intent was rejected. Evidence showed that Mariano was driving at a high speed to overtake Ferdinand’s jeep, which resulted in the victim being hit and severely injured. The Court emphasized that a prudent driver must operate a vehicle at a reasonable speed and exercise due care to avoid harm to others, considering all circumstances. The petitioner’s acquaintance with the victim and the environment imposed a duty to foresee and avoid such risks.


Legal Standard for Reckless Imprudence and Its Application

Reckless imprudence is defined as a voluntary act lacking malice but characterized by culpable carelessness or failure to exercise necessary precautions, resulting in material damage. To constitute reckless imprudence, the act must be a willful or wanton disregard of probable consequences, not a mere slip or inattention. The Court noted that Mariano’s high speed and overtaking maneuver demonstrated such culpable disregard. The proximate cause of Ferdinand’s injuries was the petitioner’s imprudent driving.


Mitigating Circumstances and Penalty Imposition

The Court explained that voluntary surrender is not an absolute mitigating circumstance for reckless imprudence, as the circumstances and degree of negligence must be considered with judicial discretion. Moreover, the CA had erred in imposing a penalty corresponding to a grave felony, which the petitioner’s conduct would have constituted if intentional. Based on the actual injuries sustained by Ferdinand, which incapacitated him for over 90 days but did not seriously impair his faculties, the offense falls under less grave felonies with corresponding correctional penalties.


Correct Penalty for Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Serious Physical Injuries

Applying Article 365 of the Revised Penal Code, recognizing the gravity of injuries under Article 263 (3) of the RPC, the Court held the appropriate penalty to be arresto mayor in its minimum and medium periods, ranging from one to four months. Given the absence of aggravating circumstances and the limited maximum duration of imprisonment, the Indeterminate Sentence Law did not apply, justifying the imposition of a straight penalty of two months of arresto mayor.


Damages Award and Interest

The Court affirmed the CA’s reduced award of actual damages at P58,402.75 after accounting for an earlier P50,000.00 financial assistance already provided by Mariano. This amount was supported by receipts and other competent evidence proving the medi


...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.