Case Summary (P.E.T. Case No. 005)
Factual Background
The vice presidential contest in the 2016 elections was extremely close with protestee declared the winner on May 30, 2016 after the canvass by Congress. The official canvass showed protestee with 14,418,817 votes and protestant with 14,155,344 votes, a margin of 263,473 votes. Protestant thereafter filed an election protest before the Tribunal challenging protestee’s proclamation and alleging widespread electoral irregularities, seeking annulment, recount, revision, and technical examinations of election paraphernalia in numerous clustered precincts.
Filing of the Protest
Protestant filed his Election Protest on June 29, 2016. He pleaded two causes of action: a First Cause of Action attacking the authenticity of the Certificates of Canvass (COCs) and the Consolidation and Canvass System (CCS) as bases for proclamation, and a Second Cause of Action alleging massive frauds, irregularities, and anomalies in 39,221 clustered precincts, with varying remedies sought including annulment of results in certain provinces and revision and recount of ballots in others. Protestant paid an initial cash deposit of PHP 200,000.
Protestant’s Causes of Action and Reliefs Sought
Protestant prayed that the Tribunal declare protestee’s proclamation null and void for lack of authentic COCs, annul election results in specified provinces where he alleged terrorism prevented voting, and order the collection, retrieval, and manual recount and revision of ballots and related forensic and technical examinations of automated election equipment, SD cards, ballot images, voter lists and registration records in the protested clustered precincts. Ultimately, he prayed for a declaration that he obtained the highest number of valid votes and should be declared Vice President.
Respondent’s Answer and Counter‑Protest
Protestee filed a Verified Answer with Special and Affirmative Defenses and a Counter-Protest on August 15, 2016. She moved for dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and insufficiency in form and substance under the 2010 PET Rules and contended that protestant’s challenge to proclamation was a pre-proclamation controversy that should have been brought before the National Board of Canvassers. Protestee also counter-protested ballots in 7,547 clustered precincts in thirteen provinces and alleged vote-buying and other irregularities in areas described as protestant bailiwicks. She paid an initial deposit of PHP 200,000.
Procedural Disputes on Timeliness and Verification
The parties disputed the timeliness of protestee’s Answer and protestant’s Answer to the Counter-Protest. Protestant moved to strike as late protestee’s Answer; protestee moved to expunge protestant’s Answer to the Counter-Protest as belated. The Tribunal examined postal certifications and accepted protestee’s Answer, denied motions to strike, and resolved the timeliness and verification issues in a Resolution dated January 24, 2017, holding that the Tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction under Section 4, Article VII of the 1987 Constitution and that the Protest was sufficient in form and substance.
Precautionary and Custody Orders; COMELEC Stripping and Closure
The Tribunal issued a Precautionary Protection Order on July 12, 2016 directing COMELEC and its agents to preserve ballots and election paraphernalia in 92,509 clustered precincts. COMELEC sought authority to conduct closure and stripping activities pursuant to its contract with Smartmatic, asserting contractual obligations and lease expiry concerns. The Tribunal authorized closure and stripping limited to physical dismantling and preserved election results data, and allowed party representatives to observe, while securing assurances that results would not be compromised.
Cash Deposits and Financial Requirements
Under Rule 33 of the 2010 PET Rules, the Tribunal computed the required cash deposits because the Protest and Counter‑Protest required retrieval of ballot boxes. The Tribunal required protestant to pay a total of PHP 66,023,000 in two installments and required protestee to pay PHP 15,439,000 in two installments. Both parties complied with the initial and subsequent payments as directed, with protestant paying his installments in April and July 2017 and protestee paying the first installment and seeking deferment of the second until after an initial determination under Rule 65.
Appointment of Panel and Preliminary Conference
The Tribunal constituted a panel of three Commissioners to aid in disposition and appointed a Head Revisor system and other personnel for the revision. A comprehensive preliminary conference was conducted on July 11, 2017 to simplify issues, obtain stipulations, and set preparation steps for retrieval and revision. The parties agreed to witness limits and that the Tribunal would adopt the Judicial Affidavit Rule for testimonial evidence.
Dismissal of the First Cause of Action and Preliminary Conference Order
In the Resolution dated August 29, 2017 the Tribunal dismissed the First Cause of Action as legally and practically futile because protestant did not seek a manual recount of ballots in all clustered precincts, rendering an annulment of proclamation without a full recount meaningless. The Tribunal issued a Preliminary Conference Order limiting the proceedings to the Second and Third Causes of Action and designated Camarines Sur, Iloilo, and Negros Oriental as protestant’s three pilot provinces under Rule 65 to serve as test cases for whether the protestant could make a prima facie recovery sufficient to proceed to the remaining contested precincts.
Motions for Retrieval, Decryption, and Technical Examination
Protestant moved for retrieval of ballot boxes and election paraphernalia and for decryption and printing of ballot images and technical examination of voters’ signatures in certain provinces. The Tribunal granted retrieval, decryption and printing only for the pilot provinces and deferred technical examination in provinces alleged in the Third Cause of Action (Lanao del Sur, Maguindanao, Basilan) pending the Rule 65 initial determination, emphasizing judicial economy and logistical constraints.
Revisor’s Guide, Amendments to Procedures, and Threshold Issue
To govern the revision under AES conditions, the Tribunal issued the PET Revisor’s Guide and amended the composition and compensation of Revision Committees. A major procedural issue arose over the shading threshold to determine valid votes—whether to apply the 50% threshold in the 2010 PET Rules or the 25% range asserted in COMELEC materials. After submissions, the Tribunal directed Head Revisors to use the Election Returns generated by the VCMs as the guiding baseline and amended Rule 62 of the Revisor’s Guide so that segregation and classification of ballots would be done with reference to the machine-generated Election Returns rather than by a fixed percentage shading rule.
Retrieval and Decryption Operations and Venue Preparation
The Tribunal coordinated exploratory retrieval missions and authorized the use and retrofitting of the Supreme Court gymnasium as the revision venue. COMELEC delivered procedures for decryption and printing. Decryption and printing of ballot images for the pilot provinces commenced on October 23, 2017, with the Tribunal supervising authentication, and COMELEC later turned over custody of printed ballot images, audit logs and election returns for the pilot provinces to the Tribunal on December 3, 2018. The physical retrieval and transfer of ballot boxes from the three pilot provinces concluded on September 19, 2018.
Revision Methodology and Conduct of the Revision
The Tribunal structured the revision to verify physical counts, recount votes, and record party objections and claims. Fifty Revision Committees, each with a Head Revisor and party revisors, conducted the revision beginning April 2, 2018. The process required authentication of ballots, segregation into categories (votes for protestant, votes for protestee, other candidates, stray votes), registration of parties’ claims and objections, and preparation of Revision Reports. Revision Supervisors resolved threshold and shading questions during revision and prepared Incident Reports on irregularities for the panel of Commissioners’ examination.
Ballot Appreciation Guidelines and Appreciation Stage
After revision, the Tribunal adopted the PET Guidelines in the Appreciation of Ballots Under the Automated Election System to govern the appreciation stage with the cardinal objective to discover and give effect to the voter’s intent. The appreciation of ballots from the pilot provinces commenced January 14, 2019 and concluded August 14, 2019. The Tribunal classified objections (for example, spurious ballots, substituted ballots, shaded by one or more, marked ballots, pre-shaded ballots) and claims (ambiguous votes, over-votes, machine-rejected ballots) and set out rules for admission or rejection of such items.
Results of Revision and Appreciation in the Pilot Provinces
The Tribunal revised and appreciated paper ballots and decrypted ballot images in five thousand four hundred fifteen clustered precincts in Camarines Sur, Iloilo, and Negros Oriental. The revision and appreciation produced a new computed national total by combining unchanged votes in the non-pilot precincts and the results from the pilot precincts after adjudication of objections and claims. Using the official canvass as the starting point (protestee 14,418,817; protestant 14,155,344), and substituting revised pilot-province totals, the Tribunal computed new totals of 14,436,337 votes for protestee and 14,157,771 votes for protestant. The revision therefore increased protestee’s lead from 263,473 to 278,566 votes.
Interim Rulings, Sanctions, and Other Orders
The Tribunal imposed a P50,000 fine on each party for violations of the sub judice rule and sternly warned them against repetition. The Tribunal denied protestant’s Motion to Inhibit Member-in-Charge Associate Ju
...continue reading
Case Syllabus (P.E.T. Case No. 005)
Parties and Procedural Posture
- FERDINAND "BONGBONG" R. MARCOS, JR. filed an Election Protest before the Presidential Electoral Tribunal challenging the election and proclamation of MARIA LEONOR "LENI DAANG MATUWID" G. ROBREDO as Vice President in the May 9, 2016 National and Local Elections.
- The protest alleged massive electoral frauds in a nationwide set of protested clustered precincts and prayed for annulment of certain provincial results, revision and recount in specified clustered precincts, and nullification of the proclamation.
- The Tribunal treated the present Resolution as preliminary and interlocutory and directed further proceedings, including the submission of memoranda by the parties.
Key Factual Allegations
- Protestant alleged systematic irregularities, including terrorism, violence, intimidation, vote-buying, pre-shaded ballots, substitution and flying voters, pre-loaded SD cards, VCM malfunction and misreading, and abnormally high unaccounted votes/undervotes in the protested precincts.
- The Protest targeted a total of 39,221 clustered precincts, alleging that in 2,756 clustered precincts in Lanao del Sur, Maguindanao, and Basilan no actual election took place due to terrorism.
- The nationwide canvass showed protestee with 14,418,817 votes and protestant with 14,155,344 votes, giving protestee an initial margin of 263,473 votes as proclaimed by Congress.
Causes of Action
- The Protest originally pleaded three principal causes of action as later articulated by the Tribunal: first, annulment of protestee’s proclamation on the theory that Certificates of Canvass (COCs) and CCS outputs were unauthentic; second, revision and recount of ballots and technical examination of election paraphernalia in 36,465 clustered precincts; and third, annulment of election results in Maguindanao, Lanao del Sur, and Basilan on the ground of terrorism affecting 2,756 clustered precincts.
- The Tribunal later dismissed the First Cause of Action as futile because protestant had limited his practical relief to specific protested clustered precincts and did not seek a manual recount of ballots nationwide.
Preliminary and Procedural History
- The Tribunal issued a Precautionary Protection Order over 92,509 clustered precincts and summoned protestee to answer the Protest, to which she filed an Answer with Counter-Protest contesting 7,547 clustered precincts.
- The Tribunal found the Protest sufficient in form and in substance and denied various threshold challenges by protestee in its January 24, 2017 Resolution.
- The Tribunal constituted a panel of three Commissioners, appointed Revision Committees, and adopted modified procedures for the revision, including the Revisor's Guide dated January 16, 2018 and subsequent amendments to the composition and compensation of revisors.
Reliefs and Interim Orders
- The Tribunal authorized the COMELEC to conduct closure and stripping activities over AES equipment subject to safeguards and allowed party representatives to observe such activities.
- The Tribunal required substantial cash deposits under Rule 33 of the 2010 PET Rules, fixing protestant’s total additional deposit at P66,023,000.00 and protestee’s at P15,439,000.00, with installment schedules, and noted compliance by both parties.
- The Tribunal lifted the Precautionary Protection Order as to 45,751 clustered precincts not covered by the Second and Third Causes of Action for lack of further purpose.
Revision and Appreciation Process
- The Tribunal retrieved ballot