Title
Maquiling vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 195649
Decision Date
Apr 16, 2013
Rommel Arnado, a repatriated Filipino, disqualified from mayoral race after using U.S. passport post-renunciation, reverting to dual citizenship. Maquiling declared winner as qualified second-placer.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 156367)

Facts

Rommel Arnado, a natural-born Filipino who became a naturalized U.S. citizen, applied for repatriation under RA 9225. He took the required Oath of Allegiance on July 10, 2008, and again on April 3, 2009, executing a sworn renunciation of his U.S. citizenship. Despite that renunciation, immigration records show he used his U.S. passport to travel in and out of the Philippines four times between April and November 2009. He obtained a Philippine passport on June 18, 2009, and thereafter used it exclusively. On November 30, 2009, he filed his Certificate of Candidacy for mayor of Kauswagan, Lanao del Norte.

COMELEC First Division Ruling

Linog Balua filed a petition on April 28, 2010, to disqualify or cancel Arnado’s candidacy, alleging lack of residency and foreign citizenship. The First Division treated it as a disqualification case. It found no residency issue but held that Arnado’s continued use of his U.S. passport negated his sworn renunciation, indicating no genuine intent to abandon his U.S. citizenship. Accordingly, it granted the petition, annulled his proclamation, and ordered succession under Section 44 of the Local Government Code.

COMELEC En Banc Ruling

On reconsideration, the en banc reversed the First Division. It held that once Arnado renounced U.S. citizenship under RA 9225, he became a pure Filipino again and that isolated use of a foreign passport does not “un-renounce” what was duly renounced. It distinguished the case from precedent involving naturalized Filipinos bound by stricter allegiance rules. It accepted Arnado’s explanation that he had not yet received his Philippine passport when he used the U.S. passport in late 2009. Maquiling’s intervention to claim the mayoralty was denied, and Arnado’s proclamation was upheld.

Intervention and Applicable Legal Provisions

Republic Act No. 6646, Section 6, permits intervention in disqualification proceedings even after proclamation, so long as no final judgment has been rendered. Local Government Code Section 40(d) disqualifies dual citizens from running for elective local office. Section 44 prescribes vice-mayor succession if a mayoralty vacancy occurs.

Supreme Court’s Analysis on Intervention

The Court confirmed that Maquiling properly intervened before the COMELEC en banc under RA 6646, Section 6. Intervention does not cease because an en banc resolution has been issued. Maquiling’s interest in succession upon Arnado’s disqualification justified his participation in the case before final resolution by this Court.

Supreme Court’s Analysis on Citizenship and Passport Use

The Court recognized that Arnado complied with the twin requirements of RA 9225—taking an Oath of Allegiance and executing a sworn renunciation of U.S. citizenship—thus becoming solely a Filipino for candidacy purposes. However, the Court held that renunciation is a continuing requirement: a positive act, such as traveling on a U.S. passport after April 3, 2009, constitutes a representation of U.S. citizenship that negates the sworn renunciation. While it does not strip Philippine citizenship, it re-instates dual citiz

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.