Case Summary (G.R. No. 96821)
Factual Background and Procedural History
Genbancor initiated a lawsuit against Continental Finance Corporation in Civil Case No. 19579 for the recovery of securities valued at over seven million pesos. Following a writ of preliminary attachment, a notice of garnishment was served upon Meralco, directing it to withhold any money or credits owed to Continental Finance Corporation. Meralco responded by refusing to deliver any assets in compliance with the garnishment notice, which led to a delay in action from Genbancor. Nearly ten months after the initial garnishment, Genbancor filed a motion to compel Meralco to turn over the allegedly garnished funds.
Meralco's Claim and Response
Upon being notified of Genbancor's motion, Meralco filed a manifestation asserting that it was not holding any funds due to Continental Finance Corporation and clarifying that its previous communication was not an admission of debt. Genbancor assumed that Meralco's prior letter indicated an admission of the funds' existence and sought the court's order for Meralco's qualified officers to be examined under oath regarding the alleged credits.
Court Proceedings and Rulings
The court initially ruled in favor of Genbancor, compelling Meralco to produce its qualified officer for examination. Meralco's subsequent opposition to this order was based on its assertion that it had no transactions with Continental Finance Corporation that would warrant any presumed liability. The discussions centered around relevant rules under the Rules of Court, particularly those governing garnishment and examination of debtors.
Examination of Credibility
During the proceedings, an affidavit from Meralco's money market supervisor claimed that Meralco had no outstanding credits or debts to Continental Finance Corporation, providing additional details about the specific commercial papers that were not associated with Continental. The validity of Meralco's denials was reinforced by President Sevilla of Contine
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 96821)
Case Background
- Parties Involved: The petitioner is Manila Electric Company (Meralco) and the respondents are Genbancor Development Corporation (Genbancor) and Hon. Guardsom R. Lood, in his capacity as Judge of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Branch VI.
- Nature of the Case: The case revolves around a garnishment action initiated by Genbancor against Continental Finance Corporation, where Genbancor sought to recover securities valued at more than seven million pesos.
- Initial Actions: Genbancor obtained a writ of preliminary attachment, leading to a notice of garnishment served upon Meralco to attach funds, credits, shares, interests, and deposits of Continental Finance Corporation under Meralco's control.
Key Events Leading to the Dispute
- Meralco's Response: On July 5, 1975, Meralco’s assistant general counsel communicated with the sheriff’s office, indicating that Meralco would not deliver any funds or credits due to Continental Finance Corporation.
- Delay in Action: There was a significant delay in action following the initial garnishment notice, with Genbancor filing a motion to compel Meralco to deliver the garnished amounts only on May 21, 1975.
- Meralco's Denial: On May 27, 1975, Meralco filed a manifestation denying that it held any amounts due to Continental Finance Corporation, clarifying that its earlier letter was not an admission of debt.
Procedural Developments
- Genbancor's Motion: Following Meralco's denial, Genbancor filed a motion on June 2, 1975, requesting the court to summon Meralco and Continental Finance Corporation’s officers for examination under oath, citing Rule 57, Section 10