Title
Supreme Court
Mactan-Cebu International Airport Authority vs. Urgello
Case
G.R. No. 162288
Decision Date
Apr 4, 2007
Lot expropriated for airport expansion in 1964 with reversion condition; ownership dispute arose after airport closure, leading to legal battles over reconveyance, rentals, and damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 162288)

Factual Background

Milagros Urgello was the owner of Lot No. 913-E of the Banilad Estate in Cebu City, which was subdivided into smaller parcels, including Lot No. 913-E-3. In the 1950s, the then Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA) initiated a process to expropriate Lot No. 913-E-3 for the expansion of Lahug Airport, leading to a compromise agreement wherein the government agreed to repurchase the lot, reverting ownership back to Urgello if it was no longer used for airport purposes.

Expropriation and Lease Agreements

By 1966, operations were transferred to the newly developed Mactan Airport, and the Lahug Airport ceased to function. In 1983, the Bureau of Air Transportation (renamed from CAA) entered a lease agreement with the DPWH, including Lot No. 913-E-3. Respondent Urgello filed various legal complaints to secure ownership of her properties after the encroachment caused by the construction activities of the government agencies.

Reconveyance and Legal Proceedings

In January 1989, the Regional Trial Court (RTC) ruled in favor of Urgello, affirming her right to reconveyance of Lot No. 913-E-3 after she tendered the agreed purchase price. A subsequent memorandum and a compromise agreement in 1990 incorporated terms regarding the payment for other lots and obligations to demolish illegally constructed fences.

Failure to Comply with Agreements

Despite Urgello's compliance with the agreements, the government agencies failed to execute the demolition as mandated and did not reconvey the disputed lots. Hurting the respondent’s claims for damages, the RTC subsequently ruled in favor of Urgello regarding her claims for ownership and rental payments due to the government's unlawful occupation of her properties.

Solidarity of Obligation

The RTC rendered a decision in 1999 holding all three defendants—DPWH, MCIAA, and ATO—solidarily liable to reconvey Lot No. 913-E-3, return other specified lots, and pay corresponding rentals for their extended unlawful occupation. The trial court deemed that, under Republic Act No. 6958, MCIAA assumably emerged as the legal custodian of the Lahug Airport properties, thereby inheriting associated liabilities.

Appeal and Court Findings

On appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision regarding the solidary liability of the petitioners. It addressed the claims concerning the assumption of obligations by MCIAA as ATO's successor post-creation under RA 6958. The decisions emphas

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.