Title
Macasaet vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 156747
Decision Date
Feb 23, 2005
Libel case against *Abante* staff dismissed; SC ruled Quezon City RTC lacked jurisdiction as offended party resided in Marikina, publication in Manila.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 156747)

Arraignment Proceedings and Preliminary Motions

Branch 93 of the RTC Quezon City arraigned four defendants on August 27, 1997, entering pleas of not guilty on their behalf when they refused to plead. Macasaet’s arraignment was later set for October 20. Petitioners filed an urgent motion to suspend arraignment, intending to elevate the prosecutor’s resolution to the DOJ, and a motion to dismiss for lack of territorial jurisdiction under Article 360. The court heard and denied these motions before the withdrawal-of-plea motion or DO J review could be resolved.

Venue Challenge and Evidence on Residence

Petitioners maintained that Trinidad’s address in the Information and preliminary-investigation papers was in Marikina City, thereby ousting RTC Quezon City’s jurisdiction. They submitted two barangay certifications indicating no record of Trinidad in Quezon City and bona fide residency in Marikina. The prosecution countered with Trinidad’s prior affidavit indicating dual residences and argued that venue is determined solely by the information’s allegations.

Trial Court’s Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction

On November 24, 1997, the RTC granted the motion to dismiss, observing that:
• Abante’s editorial box showed printing and first publication in Manila, not Quezon City.
• Documentary evidence (information, barangay certifications, preliminary-investigation affidavit) placed Trinidad’s residence in Marikina.
Hence, neither statutory alternative under Article 360 (place of publication or place of residence) supported Quezon City venue.

Court of Appeals’ Reversal and Remand Order

The CA reversed the dismissal, holding that Trinidad’s actual abode at the time of publication was a question of fact susceptible to amendment during preliminary investigation. It deemed the supplemental affidavit curing the alleged misjoinder of residence and rejected the barangay certificates as having no probative value on legal domicile or temporary residence.

Issues Framed for Supreme Court Review

The petition raised three principal issues:
I. Whether RTC Quezon City had territorial jurisdiction under Article 360.
II. Whether the CA erred in admitting and giving weight to the belated affidavit of Trinidad’s lessor (Del Rosario).
III. Whether Trinidad, as private complainant, had legal personality to appeal the dismissal of the criminal case’s civil aspect.

Supreme Court Ruling on Jurisdictional Allegations

Under the Revised Penal Code, a libel information must allege either the place of first publication or the actual residence of the offended party at the time of the offense. The SC found that the Information failed to include either requisite allegation, rendering venue improperly laid. Jurisdiction in criminal cases is acquired only by compliance with statutory venue provisions; defects cannot be cured by supplemental pleadings or preliminary-investigation amendments. Accordingly, the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction was correct.

Rejection of Supplemental and Curative Affidavits

The Court emphasized that supplemental pleadings under Rule 10 § 6 cannot introduce events or facts predating the principal pleading’s filing. Del Rosario’s affidavit, submitted long after the Information and without expla

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.