Title
Lumanog vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 182555
Decision Date
Sep 7, 2010
Former colonel Abadilla ambushed, killed in 1996; accused convicted despite defense claims of unreliable witnesses, ABB involvement, and inconsistent evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 182555)

Facts of the Ambush

• June 13, 1996, ~8:00 a.m.: Col. Rolando Abadilla left home in a black Honda Accord (RNA-777)
• ~8:45 a.m.: SPO2 Arthur Ortiz received report of shooting on Katipunan Avenue
• Onlookers found Abadilla shot multiple times; pronounced dead on arrival at hospital
• Spent shells and slugs (.45 and 9 mm) recovered; crime‐scene photos taken

Eyewitness Account and Investigation

• Security guard Freddie Alejo’s testimony: two men (“lookouts”) approached his elevated guard post and ordered him down; four armed men surrounded Abadilla’s car and fired shots; one grabbed Abadilla’s bag after pulling him out and fired again; all six (including lookouts) then fled in a KIA Pride getaway vehicle
• Alejo immediately gave sworn statement; later positively identified accused in a police line‐up and in court
• Other witnesses (e.g., Ani Icot, Aurora Urbano) gave statements identifying an ambush by armed men, but were not presented at trial

Arrests, Statements, and Custodial Issues

• June 19–21, 1996: Suspects Joel de Jesus, Lorenzo delos Santos, Rameses de Jesus, Cesar Fortuna, Lenido Lumanog, and others apprehended in follow-up operations
• Joel de Jesus executed two extrajudicial confessions before CID investigators with an IBP lawyer present; he later alleged torture and lack of counsel
• Allegations of illegal arrest (no warrants), torture (plastic‐bag suffocation, electrocution), and denied constitutional rights were raised before the CHR and DOJ

Trial Court Proceedings

• Murder case (Criminal Case No. Q-96-66684) tried by RTC Quezon City, Branch 103
• Prosecution relied on eyewitness testimony of Alejo and physical evidence (shells, slugs, crime-scene photos); introduced ballistics and fingerprint reports showing no match with accused’s firearms or prints
• Defense presented alibi, ballistics/fingerprint reports, medico-legal evidence of injuries consistent with torture, and denials of involvement
• RTC gave greater weight to Alejo, discredited other witnesses (e.g., Merlito Herbas) as biased
• RTC found treachery and evident premeditation; convicted Fortuna, Rameses, Lumanog, Santos, and Joel; sentenced them to death; acquitted Delos Santos and Napolitano; awarded civil damages (actual, moral, exemplary)

Court of Appeals Ruling

• April 1, 2008: CA affirmed RTC decision with modification to reclusion perpetua (abolishing death penalty under 2006 law)
• Upheld Alejo’s credibility based on close proximity, elevated vantage point, clear daylight conditions, and positive, unwavering identification
• Explained ballistics/fingerprint reports inconclusive and alibi defenses unpersuasive or uncorroborated
• Denied motions for reconsideration

Issues on Identification and Due Process

• Positive identification by a sole eyewitness may support conviction if credible and no improper motive exists
• Challenges to eyewitness account: discrepancies in prior description vs. in-court identification; brief duration of observation; multiple perpetrators; lapse of two months between crime and trial
• Additional concerns: photographic identification shown only one suspect’s photo (impermissible suggestion); lack of counsel during police line-up for accused under custodial investigation; identification influenced by a coerced extrajudicial confession

Extrajudicial Confession and Right to Counsel

• 1987 Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 12(1): right to be informed of right to counsel “preferably of his own choice,” must be in writing and in counsel’s presence; Sec. 12(2): prohibits torture or means vitiating free will; Sec. 12(3): involuntary confession inadmissible
• R.A. 7438 affirms right to counsel at all times during custodial investigation and prohibits coercive methods
• Joel’s confessions invalid: no valid written waiver, counsel not effectively independent, counsel’s presence limited to swearing‐in, possible intimidation/torture thereafter

Ballistic and Fingerprint Evidence

• Firearms examiner: slugs from Abadilla’s body ballistically matched those in another shooting, not necessarily confiscated weapons of accused—thus inconclusive for prosecution’s theory
• Dactyloscopy report: no match of latent prints from Honda Accord or KIA Pride with accused’s fingerprints; accused weapons may not have been used; print absence may result from wiping or handling

Alibi and Physical Impossibility

• Alibi defense for all accused uniform






...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.