Title
Lopez vs. Ramos
Case
A.C. No. 12081
Decision Date
Nov 24, 2020
Atty. Ramos suspended for 2 years, notarial commission revoked for gross negligence and aiding tax evasion via forged deeds of sale.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 12081)

Facts of the Case

On January 5, 2005, Lopez purchased a parcel of land located at No. 362-A L. Ibarra Street, Tondo, Manila, originally titled under Aurea Munar Masangkay's name. Lopez discovered that this title had been cancelled on February 2, 1989, and a new title was issued to Placida Ronquillo based on a forged deed of sale notarized by Ramos. Masangkay later denied executing the deed, asserting her signature was forged while she was in Canada. In a related criminal case, Ramos was initially included as a defendant but was later dropped after reinvestigation.

Allegations of Professional Misconduct

Lopez alleged that Ramos prepared two deeds of sale for the same property: one for P130,000 and another for P30,000, with the latter intended to evade taxes. Lopez argued that Ramos was negligent for not verifying the identities of the signatories, particularly since the impostor significantly varied from the actual name of the property owner.

Respondent's Defense

Ramos contended that he only notarized one deed of sale for P130,000 and argued that Lopez's documents were inadmissible since they were not certified true copies. He further claimed that allegations of negligence were mere speculation and that at the time, the identification process utilized was adequate under the notarial laws of 1989.

Findings of the Investigating Commissioner

Commissioner Erwin L. Aguilera found Ramos administratively liable for failing to ascertain the identity of the vendor and for facilitating the evasion of tax obligations. The Commissioner recommended a one-year suspension from the practice of law, revocation of his notarial commission, and disqualification from future notarial appointments for two years.

Board of Governors Resolution

The IBP Board of Governors adopted the Commissioner’s findings but modified the penalties to include a six-month suspension from the practice of law. Ramos filed a Motion for Reconsideration, which was denied without further argument warranting a reversal of the original decision.

The Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court upheld the IBP's findings, emphasizing the need for a notary public to ensure that signatories personally appear before them and verify their identities. It ruled that Ramos's actions constituted gross negligence and were detrimental to the trust inherent in notarial acts.

Legal Responsibility and Penalties

Ramos’s notarial commission was revoked, and he was disqualified from reappointment

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.