Title
Lopez vs. Orosa
Case
G.R. No. L-10817-18
Decision Date
Feb 28, 1958
Lopez supplied lumber for Plaza Theatre's construction; unpaid balance led to legal action. Court ruled materialman's lien applies only to the building, not land, and mortgage takes precedence over lien on land.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-10817-18)

Petitioner

Enrique Lopez

Respondents

• Vicente Orosa, Jr.
• Plaza Theatre, Inc.
• Luzon Surety Company, Inc.

Key Dates

• May 17 – December 4, 1946: Delivery of lumber by Lopez.
• September 25, 1946: Plaza Theatre, Inc. acquires land from Orosa for ₱6,000.
• November 16, 1946: Mortgage on land under Act No. 3344 in favor of Luzon Surety Co.
• October 25, 1947: Issuance of Original Certificate of Title No. 0-391 (Torrens).
• March 17, 1947: Deed of assignment by Orosa of 420 shares (₱42,000 value) to Lopez.
• November 12, 1947: Lopez files suit for ₱41,771.35 balance due.
• October 30, 1952: Decision of the Court of First Instance.
• February 28, 1958: Supreme Court decision.

Applicable Law

• 1935 Constitution of the Philippines
• Article 1923, Old Spanish Civil Code (refection credits)
• Act No. 3344 (registration of mortgages on non-Torrens land)
• Act No. 496 (Torrens registration)

Background Facts

Lopez agreed to furnish lumber on Orosa’s assurance of personal liability and payment on demand. He delivered materials totaling ₱62,255.85 but received only ₱20,848.50, leaving a balance of ₱41,771.35. Plaza Theatre, Inc. built the theatre on land acquired from Orosa. Orosa and the corporation later secured a ₱30,000 bank loan, mortgaging the land and building with Luzon Surety Co. as surety and mortgagee. The mortgage was registered pre-Torrens, but omitted when the property entered the Torrens System.

Procedural Posture

Lopez annotated a notice of lis pendens and sued Orosa and the corporation for the unpaid balance, praying for joint and several liability, sale of the theatre property, or sale of Orosa’s assigned shares. Defendants denied joint liability, contended the materials were on Orosa’s personal account, and asserted that stock shares were collateral limiting Lopez’s recovery. Luzon Surety Co. petitioned for annotation of its mortgage under Land Registration Case No. 17.

Trial Court and Court of Appeals Findings

Both courts held:
• Orosa and Plaza Theatre, Inc. were jointly liable for ₱41,771.35 plus interest and costs.
• Lopez acquired a materialman’s lien on the building alone, not on the land.
• The mortgagee’s interest in the land was superior to Lopez’s lien.
• The Torrens title was corrected to show Luzon Surety Co.’s encumbrance, subject to Lopez’s lien on the building.

Issues on Appeal

  1. Whether a materialman’s lien for construction materials extends to both the building and the land.
  2. Whether Lopez’s lien on the land is superior to the Luzon Surety Co. mortgage.

Supreme Court Ruling

Affirmed. Costs against appellant.

Rationale on Scope of Lien

Article 1923 grants preference to refection credits “with respect to the real estate upon which the refection was made,” but the term “real estate” must be construed in light

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.