Title
Lomugdang vs. Javier
Case
G.R. No. L-27535
Decision Date
Sep 30, 1967
Election protest over Culasi mayoralty; protestant died, vice-mayor intervened; burned ballots barred evidence aliunde; SC upheld trial court, ruling for deceased protestant.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-27535)

Facts of the Case

On May 30, 1966, Lomugdang filed a protest against Javier’s election results, claiming irregularities in the counting of ballots from Precinct No. 4. Javier subsequently filed his counter-protest, alleging errors across multiple precincts and noting that many ballots were burned due to legal compliance under the Revised Election Code after the 1965 elections. Tragically, Lomugdang died prior to the hearing, prompting Javier to move for dismissal of the protest. Alolod then filed a motion to intervene, asserting his right to the mayoral office should the protest be decided in favor of Lomugdang. The trial court allowed Alolod to intervene despite Javier’s objections.

Trial Court Proceedings

The trial court denied Javier’s motion to dismiss the protest following Lomugdang’s death, reaffirming that public interest dictates an election contest should continue regardless of a contestant's demise. On October 11, 1966, the court examined ballots from Precinct No. 4, determining a net advantage for Lomugdang. The court faced further complexities regarding evidence pertaining to the burned ballots in the counter-protested precincts, where Javier sought to introduce testimony from voters to support his claims, which involved significant numbers of precincts.

Legal Issues Presented on Appeal

Javier appealed the trial court's decisions, assigning four alleged errors: (1) refusal to dismiss the protest upon Lomugdang's death, (2) denial of the request to present evidence from voters on the counter-protest, (3) allowing Alolod to intervene, and (4) the declaration of Lomugdang as winner of the election.

Court's Rationale on Public Interest

The court ruled that the public interest in determining who legitimately holds elected office necessitates continuing the election contest despite Lomugdang’s death. It referred to established precedent confirming the right of a duly elected vice-mayor to intervene in such proceedings. The court held that this legislative intent under Section 7 of Republic Act 2264 granted Alolod a rightful stake.

Evaluation of Evidence Aliunde

Regarding the counter-protest, the court rejected the admission of evidence aliunde based on the argument that facilitating testimony from thousands of voters would effectively amount to conducting a new election—which would violate the secrecy and integrity of the elector

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.