Title
Liwayway Publishing, Inc. vs. Presidential Commission on Good Government
Case
G.R. No. 77422
Decision Date
Apr 15, 1988
Petitioners challenged PCGG's sequestration of shares in media corporations, alleging violations of press freedom and management autonomy. Courts upheld sequestration but barred PCGG from interfering in operations, emphasizing press freedom and remanding ownership issues to Sandiganbayan.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-33604-05)

Case Overview - Liwayway

In G.R. No. 77422, on February 12, 1987, the PCGG issued writs of sequestration over the shares of U.S. Automotive in Liwayway. The petitioners sought to annul these writs, arguing that the sequestration would prevent Liwayway from operating effectively and impede its editorial independence. They claimed that such actions would choke off its financial resources, harming their ability to publish. During hearings, the Solicitor General assured that the PCGG would not interfere with Liwayway's management or freedom of expression, leading to the Court’s decision to enjoin the Commission from interfering further.

Legal Proceedings and Findings - Liwayway

The Court addressed the conflicting claims made by the petitioners and the PCGG regarding Emilio Yap’s connections to the deposed President Marcos. The Court acknowledged that factual disputes should be resolved by the Sandiganbayan, which has exclusive jurisdiction over such matters. Ultimately, the claims surrounding the sequestration orders were deemed to warrant further examination in the lower court, but the Commission’s interference in Liwayway’s operations was permanently restrained.

Case Overview - Bulletin

In G.R. No. 79126, Bulletin Publishing Corporation contested the PCGG’s orders sequestering shares linked to former President Marcos and associates. The Commission attempted to vote these sequestered shares, which Bulletin argued would undermine its independence and violate constitutional protections of press freedom. They sought to prevent any government participation in their management or policy-making processes.

Legal Proceedings and Findings - Bulletin

On July 28, 1987, the Court granted a temporary restraining order against the Commission’s voting and management decisions regarding Bulletin. The Commission later determined it would no longer exercise voting power over sequestered shares, reinforcing Bulletin's independence. The Court underscored the significance of maintaining press freedom without government interference and thus rendered the temporary restraining order permanent. The legality around the cash deposit offered by Bulletin for the remaining shares under sequestration was also upheld, aligning with constituti

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.