Case Summary (G.R. No. 95305)
Factual Background
The petitioners were the registered owners of a parcel of land, covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. NT-63540, when their mother, acting as their guardian, sold the land in 1966 for P2,000 to the respondents. The transaction was documented in a Deed of Absolute Sale and was duly registered with the Register of Deeds. The respondents, after initially expressing concerns regarding the legality of the sale due to the minor status of the petitioners, were advised by legal counsel that the sale could proceed without court approval, since the property was valued under P2,000. The title was subsequently transferred to their names under Certificate of Title No. 66311.
Legal Contention
The petitioners claimed that the sale was null and void as it lacked judicial authority or court approval, which they argued was a necessary requirement for the valid disposition of minor’s property. In contrast, the respondents maintained the sale's validity, asserting that the petitioners could not rescind the contract because they had reached the age of majority, and any claims had already prescribed.
Trial Court Decision
The RTC ruled in favor of the petitioners, declaring the sale void due to the absence of judicial approval. The court ordered the cancellation of the title in the respondents' names and directed the issuance of a new title in favor of the petitioners. Furthermore, the RTC mandated that the respondents vacate the property while preserving their rights as good faith possessors.
Court of Appeals Decision
Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the RTC's decision, referencing a precedent that allowed parents to sell minor children’s property without court approval if the value was below P2,000. This court upheld the respondents’ position and dismissed the petitioners' complaint.
Supreme Court Analysis
The Supreme Court found merit in the petitioners' claims. Citing Article 320 of the New Civil Code, the court reiterated that a legal administrator, in this case, their mother, could not validly dispose of the property without court approval when its value exceeded P2,000. The Court emphasized the importance of judicial oversight in such transactions involving minors, reinforcing the restrictions placed on a parent’s authority to ensure the protection of the children's interests.
Good Faith and Prescription
The S
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 95305)
Case Overview
- This case involves a petition for review on certiorari regarding the decision of the Court of Appeals dated August 8, 1990, which dismissed a complaint for annulment of a sale of registered land.
- The Regional Trial Court of San Jose City had previously ruled in favor of the petitioners, Elena, Oscar, Celia, Teresita, and Virgilio Lindain, declaring the sale of their property null and void.
- The legal dispute centers around whether the sale of the property by the minors' mother, acting as their guardian, required judicial approval.
Parties Involved
- Petitioners: Elena, Oscar, Celia, Teresita, and Virgilio Lindain, all minors at the time of the sale.
- Respondents: Spouses Apolonia Valiente and Federico Ila, the buyers of the property.
- Mother of Petitioners: Dolores Luluquisin, who sold the property while acting as a guardian for her minor children.
Background of the Case
- The petitioners were registered owners of a parcel of land covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. NT-63540.
- On November 7, 1966, their mother sold the land for P2,000 to the respondents without obtaining judicial approval, claiming that the property’s value exempted it from the requirement for court authority.
- The sale was formalized through a Deed of Absolute Sale, which was subsequently registered, resulting in the issuance of Transfer Certificate of Title No. NT-66311 to the respondents.