Case Summary (G.R. No. 100127)
Summary of DECS Order No. 30
DECS Order No. 30 permitted private schools to raise tuition fees and other school fees, contingent upon certain conditions. It established guidelines that included limitations on tuition increases, a process for these increases to be approved, and stipulations for emergency fee assessments in response to economic factors. Notably, the Order allowed for increases without requiring prior consultation in specific instances, particularly for entering freshmen, while imposing certain parameters for upper-year students and other fees.
Petitioner's Legal Position
Senator Lina argued that Secretary Carino lacked the legal authority to issue DECS Order No. 30 because the authority to regulate school fees had been transferred to the State Assistance Council (SAC) under Republic Act No. 6728. He contended that prior rulings from the Supreme Court on the authority of the DECS Secretary were superseded by this later statute, which placed the power to issue regulations firmly with the SAC, thus rendering DECS Order No. 30 invalid.
Respondent's Defense
The Solicitor General, representing Secretary Carino, maintained that the power to prescribe school fees remained vested in the DECS Secretary. He asserted that although R.A. No. 6728 granted rule-making authority to the SAC, this authority pertained solely to regulations for government assistance programs and not to the regulation of tuition fee limits. The Solicitor General emphasized that DECS Order No. 30 was fundamentally consistent with the consultation requirement of R.A. No. 6728, save for a specific provision that allowed for tuition increases without consultation.
Intervenors' Positions
Two intervenors, the Philippine Association of Colleges and Universities (PACU) and the Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines (CEAP), engaged in the proceedings. PACU acknowledged the authority of the DECS Secretary in regulating tuition but contested specific provisions of DECS Order No. 30 that allowed increases without consultation. CEAP opposed the regulatory authority of both the DECS Secretary and the SAC, arguing that private schools should independently set their fees, thus contending for the complete nullification of DECS Order No. 30.
Legal Issues
The core issues at hand were: (1) whether DECS Order No. 30 was valid and whether the DECS Secretary had the authority to issue such guidelines, and (2) whether the consultation requirements under R.A. No. 6728 applied not just to tuition fees but also to other school fees. Petitioner Lina argued that all fee increases should be subject to consultation to provide protection against excessive charges, which he believed undermined the intent of the law.
Historical Context and Legal Authority
The Court noted relevant legislative history, tracing the evolution of the DECS Secretary's regulatory powers through various acts and decisions. Precedents, including t
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 100127)
Case Overview
- This case is a Petition for Prohibition and Mandamus filed by petitioner Senator Jose D. Lina, Jr. against respondent Isidro D. Carino, Secretary of the Department of Education, Culture, and Sports (DECS).
- The petitioner contests the legal authority of respondent Carino to issue DECS Order No. 30, series of 1991, which provides guidelines for tuition and other school fees in private educational institutions for the school year 1991-1992.
DECS Order No. 30
- DECS Order No. 30, dated March 11, 1991, permits private schools to increase tuition and other fees according to specified guidelines.
- The guidelines include:
- Entering Freshmen: Schools may set tuition rates subject to consultation, with no consultation required for increases not exceeding P 80.00 per unit for tertiary and P 1,500.00 per year for elementary and secondary levels.
- Upper Year Students: Prescribed tuition fee increases based on religious affiliation and level, allowing increases without consultation if within set limits.
- Emergency Tuition Fee Assessment: Schools may collect emergency assessments due to living cost adjustments without prior DECS approval.
- Other Fees: A 10% increase limit on other fees without consultation, provided notice is given to the DECS regional office.
- Consultation Process: Defined as a conference involving parents, teachers, and student representatives to discuss proposed increases, although consultation does not guarantee agreement.
- Sanctions: Sanctions from previous DECS orders remain applicable.
- Government Tuition Fee Supplement: Assistance for students in private schools with low tuition rates.
Petitioner’s Position
- Petitioner argues that respondent Secretary lacks the authority to issue DECS Order No. 30 as the power to regulate scho