Title
Limkaichong vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 178831-32
Decision Date
Apr 1, 2009
Limkaichong won elections despite disqualification petitions; COMELEC ruled her proclamation valid, shifting jurisdiction to HRET for final qualification review.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 178831-32)

Petitioners and Respondents

Petitioners before the Supreme Court:
• Jocelyn Sy Limkaichong (certiorari under Rule 65)
• Louis C. Biraogo (prohibition and injunction)
• Olivia P. Paras (quo warranto, prohibition, mandamus)
• Renald F. Villando (certiorari and injunction)

Respondents: COMELEC (Second Division and En Banc), Speaker of the House (Hon. Prospero Nograles), House officials, and Limkaichong (as respondent in some petitions).

Key Dates

• March 26, 2007 – Limkaichong filed her Certificate of Candidacy.
• April 4 & 11, 2007 – Camero and Villando filed disqualification petitions before COMELEC.
• May 14, 2007 – National and Local Elections; Limkaichong topped the vote.
• May 17, 2007 – COMELEC Second Division Joint Resolution disqualifying Limkaichong and suspending proclamation.
• May 18, 2007 – COMELEC En Banc Resolution No. 8062 established policy of not suspending proclamations with pending disqualification cases.
• May 25, 2007 – Provincial Board of Canvassers validly proclaimed Limkaichong.
• June 29, 2007 – COMELEC En Banc denied reconsideration of the Second Division resolution (equally divided vote).
• July 23, 2007 – Limkaichong assumed office as Member of the House of Representatives.
• August 16, 2007 – COMELEC En Banc resolved that all pending qualification incidents be transferred to the HRET.
• August–September 2007 – Various petitions filed in the Supreme Court challenging COMELEC resolutions and Limkaichong’s seating.

Applicable Law

• 1987 Philippine Constitution, Article VI, Section 6 (qualifications of House members) and Section 17 (sole jurisdiction of Electoral Tribunals).
• Article IX-C, Section 2(2) (COMELEC’s exclusive original jurisdiction over contests).
• Omnibus Election Code (OEC) Sections 74, 78, 241, 243, and Section 250 (jurisdiction over election contests).
• Commonwealth Act No. 473 (Revised Naturalization Law) Section 18 (proper denaturalization proceedings).
• Republic Act No. 6646 Section 6 (effect of disqualification).
• COMELEC Rules of Procedure: Rule 19(2) (effect of motions for reconsideration) and Rule 18(13) (finality of en banc resolutions).
• COMELEC Resolution No. 8062 (policy-guidelines on proclamations with pending disqualification cases).

Factual Background

Limkaichong filed her candidacy for Negros Oriental’s First District. Camero and Villando challenged her natural-born Filipino status, alleging her father’s naturalization was defective. Limkaichong maintained her father had been naturalized 19 days before her birth in November 1959. COMELEC consolidated and heard the petitions but did not resolve them before election day.

COMELEC Disqualification Proceedings

The Second Division, on May 17, 2007, ruled that Limkaichong’s father’s naturalization was void for lack of required participation by the Office of the Solicitor General and failure to observe the 30-day reglementary period. It disqualified her and directed suspension of her proclamation. Limkaichong timely moved for reconsideration, suspending execution of that resolution under COMELEC Rule 19(2).

Proclamation and Jurisdictional Issues

COMELEC En Banc Resolution No. 8062 established that winning candidates with pending disqualification cases would nonetheless be proclaimed, without prejudice to continued hearings. Pursuant to that policy and the suspended Division resolution, Limkaichong was proclaimed on May 25, 2007. She later took her oath and assumed office on June 30, 2007.

COMELEC En Banc Resolutions and Motions

June 29, 2007 – The En Banc, equally divided, denied Limkaichong’s motion for reconsideration, affirming her disqualification but refusing to suspend her proclamation under Resolution 8062. July 3, 2007 – Limkaichong filed a manifestation and motion for clarification, arguing that proclamation divested COMELEC of jurisdiction and that her case should be dismissed for lack of a majority. COMELEC did not resolve this motion until August 16, 2007, when it ruled that all pending qualification incidents must be determined by the HRET.

Assumption of Office and Jurisdiction Transfer

Upon valid proclamation, oath-taking, and assumption of duties, COMELEC’s jurisdiction over Limkaichong’s election contest ceased, and jurisdiction vested exclusively in the HRET under the Constitution (Art. VI, Sec. 17) and OEC Section 250. Any challenge to her qualifications must be brought by appropriate petition (election protest or quo warranto) before the HRET.

Related Petitions before the Supreme Court

Limkaichong filed certiorari petitions (G.R. Nos. 178831-32) assailing the Second Division and En Banc resolutions for grave abuse of discretion. Biraogo sought prohibition and injunction to oust her. Paras filed quo warranto, prohibition, and mandamus to unseat her and call special elections. Villando filed certiorari and injunction petitions against COMELEC’s August 16, 2007 determination. The petitions were consolidated for oral argument.

Issues Presented

  1. Validity of Limkaichong’s proclamation despite the Division’s disqualification order.
  2. Whether that proclamation divested COMELEC of jurisdiction over her qualifications.
  3. Whether the HRET should assume jurisdiction in lieu of COMELEC.
  4. The correctness of COMELEC’s disqualification ruling on natural-born citizenship.
  5. Finality and executory nature of COMELEC resolutions.
  6. Whether the House Speaker may be compelled to bar Limkaichong from assuming her congressional duties.

Constitutional and Legal Provisions

• House Members must be natural-born citizens, at least 25 years old, able to read and write, and residents of their district (1987 Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. 6).
• COMELEC has exclusive original jurisdiction over election contests involving elective local, city, provincial, and congressional officials (Art. IX-C, Sec. 2(2)).
• Electoral Tribunals are the sole judges of contests relating to their Members (Art. VI, Sec. 17).
• A timely motion for reconsideration suspends execution of a Division decision (COMELEC Rule 19(2)).
• Administrative policy-guidelines need not comply with for

    ...continue reading

    Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
    Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.