Title
Limbona vs. Mangelin
Case
G.R. No. 80391
Decision Date
Feb 28, 1989
Sultan Limbona, Speaker of Regional Assembly, expelled after declaring recess; court reinstates him, citing due process violations and invalid sessions.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 80391)

Petition and Procedural History

Petitioner sought:
(a) Prohibition of assembly sessions from Nov. 5, 1987 onward;
(b) Declaration that Nov. 2, 1987 proceedings void;
(c) Validation of his March 12, 1987 election as Speaker;
(d) Permanent injunction.
Pending resolution, the Assembly adopted a resolution expelling Limbona for allegedly usurping pay authority and improperly withdrawing Assembly funds, and for filing this Supreme Court petition. Respondents contended the petition was moot and academic.

Expulsion and Due Process

The Court held the expulsion resolution ineffective because:
– No evidence of notice or hearing; due process requires at least opportunity to be heard.
– Charges were unsubstantiated accusations; no formal investigation or chance to rebut.
– Retaliatory nature: expulsion threatened for seeking judicial remedy, which is constitutionally protected.
Accordingly, Limbona’s expulsion did not render the case moot, and he was entitled to reinstatement unless properly removed after due process.

Scope of Judicial Jurisdiction Over Autonomous Regions

Issue: whether national courts may review acts of “autonomous” governments under PD 1618.
– PD 1618 created “internal autonomy” for Regions IX and XII “within the framework of national sovereignty and territorial integrity” with legislative and executive machinery.
– The President retains “general supervision and control” (PD 1618, Sec. 35) to ensure compliance with national law and policies.
– Sangguniang Pampook’s powers (PD 1618, Sec. 7) are chiefly administrative and subject to presidential oversight.
Conclusion: the autonomy granted was one of administrative decentralization, not complete political independence; thus, the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review internal acts, including removal of members and officers.

Autonomy: Administration vs. Political Power

– Administrative decentralization: local units manage internal affairs, remain under central supervision, and cannot dispense with national oversight.
– Political decentralization: full self-government, accountable only to constituents.
– PD 1618 exemplifies administrative decentralization—autonomy “within the framework” of national sovereignty, with presidential supervisory power—so its acts are judicially reviewable.

Validity of the Sessions and the Claimed Recess

Background
– Oct. 21, 1987: House Committee on Muslim Affairs invited Limbona to assist in hearings Nov. 1–15, 1987.
– Limbona instructed Acting Secretary to announce a “recess” of the Assembly for that period.
Respondents’ Challenge
– Held sessions on Nov. 2 and 5, 1987, declared his speakership vacant, and elected presiding officers.
Rules Issue
– Sangguniang Pampook Rules allow recess only at the Speaker’s discretion during session; sessions cannot be adjou








...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.