Title
Lim vs. HMR Philippines, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 201483
Decision Date
Aug 4, 2014
Conrado Lim sued HMR Philippines for illegal dismissal; SC ruled backwages until reinstatement, 10% salary increase (1998-2000), and legal interest, denying additional damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 201483)

Applicable Law

The 1987 Philippine Constitution and the Labor Code, particularly Article 279 regarding security of tenure and backwages, are central to the decision in this case.

Procedural Background

The dispute began when Lim filed a case for illegal dismissal on February 8, 2001. The Labor Arbiter initially dismissed his complaint, but the NLRC later reversed this decision on April 11, 2003, declaring Lim's dismissal illegal and ordering his reinstatement with backwages. Following various appeals and modifications, the Court of Appeals, on November 15, 2005, affirmed the NLRC decision but awarded additional damages to Lim. HMR opposed the calculation of backwages based on the premise that they should be limited to the NLRC's decision date.

Issues Raised

The primary legal issues involved whether the computation of backwages should end with the NLRC's decision date or extend to actual reinstatement, whether Lim was entitled to his unpaid annual salary increase from 1998 to 2000, and whether he was due additional compensation for holiday pay, sick leave, and moral damages.

Ruling of the Court of Appeals

The Court of Appeals upheld the NLRC's decision, stating that the dispositive portion of judgments overruling complaints must prevail over contradictory portions in the body of the hand decisions involving backwages, which were restricted by the NLRC's ruling to the date of its promulgation, thus barring further claims for backwages.

Court’s Evaluation on Backwages

The Court underscored that backwages for illegally dismissed employees include full wages until actual reinstatement, as mandated by Article 279 of the Labor Code. It was recognized that Lim had been illegally dismissed and was entitled to backwages from February 3, 2001, until his actual reinstatement. However, the original ruling of the NLRC limiting the backwages to the date of promulgation was crucial, as such judgments maintain finality, which restricts the ability to amend or recalculate those awards.

Computation of Backwages and Additional Claims

The Court clarified the computation of backwages, stating that Lim was to receive his backwages calculated from February 3, 2001, till reinstatement, including the previously awarded annual salary increase for 1998-2000, which acknowledged that these were benefits that Lim had legitimately accrued before his illegal termination.

Analysis of Holiday Pay and Sick Leave

Determining holiday pay's inclusion in Lim's salary required further examination by the Labor Arbiter, given that company policies could affect how payments are computed. Concerning sick leave benefits, the Court indicated that Lim was entitled to have his unused sick leaves converted into cash, which pointed towards HMR's duty to fulfill this obligation.

Arguments on Moral and Exemplary Damages

Although Lim sought additional damages due to perceived delays and bad faith by HMR regarding his reinstatement, the Court found insufficient grounds for such awards as HMR appeared to have acted within the ambit of legal remedies available to

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.