Title
Lim vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 125817
Decision Date
Jan 16, 2002
A 1990 jeepney-truck collision led to a damages claim by the jeepney's unregistered owner under the kabit system. Courts upheld his right to sue, awarding P236,000 for repairs and lost income, with legal interest from the judgment date.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 13035)

Issue Presented

Whether Gonzales, as non-registered owner/operator under the “kabit” system, has legal personality to sue for damages caused by petitioners’ negligence, and whether the quantum and timing of interest awarded by lower courts are appropriate.

Lower Courts’ Rulings

The trial court held Gonzales to be the real party in interest despite Vallarta’s registered CPC. It attributed negligence to Gunnaban and vicarious liability to Lim for inadequate employee supervision. It awarded P236,000 compensatory damages with interest from the accident date and P30,000 attorney’s fees. The Court of Appeals affirmed, but recognized that under the kabit system the registered owner should generally be joined, yet made an equitable exception allowing Gonzales to proceed alone.

Doctrine on the “Kabit” System

The “kabit” arrangement permits unlicensed operators to run PUJs under another’s CPC, but is void under Art. 1409, Civil Code, as contrary to public policy designed to ensure financial responsibility for accidents. Precedents bar registered owners from escaping liability through proof of transfer to an unlicensed operator, protecting the riding public.

Analysis on Real Party in Interest

The Court finds the kabit system’s policy aim—pinpointing the responsible party—is not implicated here: the accident was caused by a third party, not by misrepresentation to the public. Neither the riding public nor other road users were misled or placed at risk by Gonzales’s non-registration. Equity demands that Gonzales, being the sole injured party, may enforce his claim directly.

Compensation and Damages

Damages in tort aim to restore the plaintiff to his pre-tort financial position and include both actual loss (damnum emergens) and loss of earning capacity (lucrum cessans). The award of P236,000 reflects both repair costs and lost earnings (average P300/day) and is neither speculative nor excessive. Petitioners offered no evidence to refute this valuation.

Interest on Unliquidated Claims

Under Art. 2213, Civil Code, unliquidated damages cannot bear interest from the date of the accident; interest at 6% per annum should run only from the final judgment date when the amount is reasonably ascertained. The Court modifies the award accordingly: 6% interest from the trial cou

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.