Title
Liberal Party, represented by Francis N. Pangili, vs. Commission on Elections and Nacionalista Party, represented by Manuel B. Villar
Case
G.R. No. 247645
Decision Date
Jul 26, 2022
LP challenged COMELEC's designation of NP as Dominant Minority Party for 2019 elections; SC ruled petition moot, upheld COMELEC's discretion, and declined advisory opinion.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 247645)

Applicable Law

The case hinges on the constitutional powers granted to the Commission on Elections as outlined in the 1987 Philippine Constitution, particularly regarding its authority to enforce election laws and regulations, as well as the mechanisms for accrediting political parties under Republic Act No. 7166, as amended.

Summary of Proceedings

The Liberal Party sought accreditation as the Dominant Minority Party for the national and local elections scheduled for May 13, 2019. The Commission on Elections issued Resolution No. 10514 detailing the criteria for accreditation, which included considering the political party's historical performance in elections, the number of incumbent officials, and the ability to present a full slate of candidates, among other criteria. The Nacionalista Party was ultimately designated as the Dominant Minority Party in Resolution No. 10538.

Petitioner’s Claims

The Liberal Party contended that the COMELEC displayed grave abuse of discretion by not adhering to the Omnibus Election Code’s definition of a dominant opposition party when determining who qualified as the Dominant Minority Party. It claimed that the Nacionalista Party, being part of the ruling coalition, should not have been classified as "opposing" to the majority. The Liberal Party also sought the annulment of the COMELEC resolution and the establishment of clearer guidelines for future elections.

Respondents’ Arguments

The COMELEC and the Nacionalista Party maintained that the petition was moot since the elections had concluded, thus any relief sought regarding the accreditation would no longer hold practical significance. They asserted that the criteria used for designating the dominant parties were consistent with existing laws and did not constitute any abuse of discretion.

Judicial Findings

The court determined that the matter was moot due to the conclusion of the 2019 elections, which rendered the Petition for Certiorari without merit. The Court emphasized the requirement of an actual case or controversy for its jurisdiction to be engaged. Petitioner’s assertions were found not to contest the specific findings of Resolution No. 10538 but rather the methodology used in determining party accreditation. It was noteworthy that the Liberal Party did not contest the specific criteria established in Resolution No. 10

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.