Title
Leonor vs. Ayon-Ayon
Case
A.C. No. 12624
Decision Date
Sep 16, 2020
Complainant alleged fraudulent sale of property, forged notarized documents; Supreme Court dismissed complaints against notaries, citing compliance with notarial rules and lack of liability.

Case Summary (A.C. No. 12624)

Background Facts

The complainant is the registered owner of a parcel of land in Quezon City, covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 46664. In September 2013, he discovered that an individual named Frederick Bonamy was in possession of a Deed of Absolute Sale purportedly signed by him and his wife, Teresita. The couple never authorized the sale and did not sign any documents regarding the property, as Teresita had been residing in the United States since December 2013. After confirming the fraudulent nature of the transaction, complainant filed a complaint against both attorneys with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines-Commission on Bar Discipline (IBP-CBD) on January 29, 2015.

Allegations Against Respondents

The complainant asserted that both Atty. Ayon-Ayon and Atty. Mananquil violated Administrative Matter No. 02-8-13-SC (2004 Rules on Notarial Practice) by not requiring the physical presence of the Leonors during notarization of the relevant documents. Specifically, Atty. Ayon-Ayon notarized the Deed on March 13, 2014, while Atty. Mananquil notarized the Sworn Statement on April 15, 2014. The absence of the complainant and his wife at the executions was critical to the allegations.

Response from Attorneys

Atty. Mananquil claimed he did not notarize the Sworn Statement and provided a certification proving that it was not among the documents reported by him. He alleged that his name had been used fraudulently by others. Conversely, Atty. Ayon-Ayon contended that he conducted due diligence, asserting the Spouses Leonor and Bonamy had personally appeared before him and presented appropriate identification.

Findings of the IBP-CBD

The IBP-CBD, through Investigating Commissioner Rico A. Limpingco's Report and Recommendation on January 11, 2016, recommended dismissing the complaint against Atty. Mananquil and revoking Atty. Ayon-Ayon's notarial commission due to negligence. The Board of Governors of the IBP modified the recommendation by extending the suspension period for Atty. Ayon-Ayon from three to six months and disqualifying him from being commissioned as a notary for two years.

Reconsideration Motion

Dissatisfied with the resolution, Atty. Ayon-Ayon filed a Motion for Reconsideration presenting arguments related to his supposed due diligence and the existence of altered documents post-notarization. He subsequently filed a Supplemental Motion reiterating that the notarized Deed attached to his answer differed from the one submitted by the complainant and that the alterations occurred after his notarization.

Conclusion of the IBP-BOG

On May 9, 2019, the IBP-BOG reversed its prior ruling, concluding that Atty. Ayon-Ayon had properly p

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.