Title
Lemoncito vs. BSM Crew Service Centre Philippines, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 247409
Decision Date
Feb 3, 2020
Seafarer Lemoncito, diagnosed with hypertension and declared unfit by an independent doctor, was awarded permanent disability benefits as the company-designated doctors' inconclusive assessment rendered his condition compensable by law.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 247409)

Background and Nature of Employment

Michael Angelo T. Lemoncito, a motor man, was hired by BSM Crew Service Centre Philippines, Inc. on July 16, 2015, for a nine-month contract under a collective bargaining agreement. He boarded MV British Ruby shortly thereafter, only to suffer health issues including a fever, cough, and high blood pressure during his employment. Following these complaints, he was medically repatriated on February 22, 2016, leading to a series of medical evaluations.

Medical Findings and Employer's Assessment

Upon repatriation, Lemoncito underwent medical evaluations with company-designated doctors, who diagnosed him with lower respiratory tract infection and hypertension. The doctors issued an interim disability rating of Grade 12, indicating that his condition was not attributable solely to work-related factors, attributing causes to genetics and lifestyle choices. Despite treatment, he was eventually cleared of respiratory issues, but his hypertension remained a point of contention.

Dispute and Competing Medical Opinions

Discontent with the conclusions of the company-designated medical team, Lemoncito sought a second opinion from Dr. Antonio Pascual, who diagnosed him with hypertensive heart disease and degenerative osteoarthritis. Based on this diagnosis, he sought to invoke the grievance procedure within the CBA, claiming total permanent disability entitlement and benefits, arguing that his long working hours significantly contributed to his hypertension.

Rulings of the Panel of Voluntary Arbitrators

In a decision rendered on May 30, 2017, the Panel of Voluntary Arbitrators found Lemoncito to be totally and permanently disabled, concluding that his hypertension was presumed work-related. The panel dismissed the significance of the third-doctor-referral rule in light of the failure of the company-designated doctors to issue a final assessment within the requisite time frame. The panel awarded Lemoncito significant compensation for his disability.

Court of Appeals Review and Decision

Respondents appealed to the Court of Appeals, claiming Lemoncito failed to meet the burden of proof regarding the work-related nature of his hypertension. The Court sided with the respondents, concluding that the company-designated doctors' findings were credible and that the procedures outlined in the POEA-SEC were not properly followed by the petitioner. The appellate court reversed the earlier ruling, dismissing Lemoncito's complaint for lack of merit, and deemed the assessments by the company-designated doctors conclusive regarding his fitness for work.

Supreme Court Review and Ruling

Lemoncito's subsequent petition to the Supreme Court urged a reversal of the appellate court’s decision. The Supreme Court clarified that the purpose of the pre-employment medical examination is to ascerta

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.