Title
Source: Supreme Court
Lee vs. Regional Trial Court of Quezon City, Branch 85
Case
G.R. No. 146006
Decision Date
Feb 23, 2004
Dispute over unauthorized sale of estate shares in Philinterlife; intestate court nullified sales, upheld writ of execution, affirmed by Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 146006)

Petitioners

Jose C. Lee (President of Philinterlife and FLAG)
Alma Aggabao (Corporate Secretary of Philinterlife)

Respondents

Regional Trial Court of Quezon City, Branch 85 (Judge Pedro M. Areola et al.)
Ma. Divina OrtaÁez-Enderes (Special Administratrix of Dr. OrtaÁez’s estate)

Key Dates

• July 6, 1956 – Incorporation of Philinterlife
• July 21, 1980 – Death of Dr. OrtaÁez
• March 10, 1982 – Appointment of Rafael and José OrtaÁez as joint special administrators
• April 15, 1989 & October 30, 1991 – Sales of Philinterlife shares by widow and son, respectively, to FLAG without court approval
• August 11 & 29, 1997 – Intestate court orders voiding sales and extrajudicial partition
• June 23, 1998 & October 9, 1998 – Court of Appeals and Supreme Court affirm nullity of sales
• July 6, 2000 – Intestate court issues writ of execution to restore shares to the estate
• July 26, 2000 – Court of Appeals dismisses petitioners’ certiorari
• February 23, 2004 – Supreme Court decision on Rule 45 petition

Applicable Law

1987 Philippine Constitution; Civil Code (Art. 493 on co-ownership; Art. 533 on transmission of hereditary property); Rules of Court (Rule 39, Sec. 10; Rule 45).

Background of Estate Proceedings

Upon Dr. OrtaÁez’s death, his widow and children filed for letters of administration. No regular administrator was appointed; special administrators Rafael and José OrtaÁez submitted an inventory including 2,029 Philinterlife shares (50.725% of outstanding stock).

Unauthorized Sales and Acquisition by FLAG

Without prior court approval, Juliana OrtaÁez sold 1,014 shares to FLAG on April 15, 1989, failing to repurchase within the agreed period. On October 30, 1991, José OrtaÁez likewise sold 1,011 shares to FLAG. FLAG consolidated title to all 2,029 shares.

Intestate Court Orders Annulling the Sales

Ma. Divina OrtaÁez-Enderes moved to nullify the extrajudicial settlement and sales. On August 11, 1997, the trial court ruled that any sale of estate property without probate court approval is void (citing Godoy v. Orellano). On August 29, 1997, it declared the 1982 partition agreement partially void ab initio insofar as it transferred stock.

Appellate Proceedings

José OrtaÁez alone sought certiorari in the Court of Appeals, which denied relief on June 23, 1998, holding that heirs cannot dispose of estate property without court approval and that the resulting sales were void. The Supreme Court dismissed his Rule 45 petition on technical grounds (Oct. 5, 1998), rendering the nullity final on February 23, 1999.

FLAG thereafter diluted the estate’s interest by increasing Philinterlife’s capital stock. Enderes obtained a writ of execution on July 6, 2000, to restore the 2,029 shares to the estate and to recognize her voting rights as special administratrix. Petitioners ignored service, prompting contempt proceedings.

Issue on Execution and Due Process

FLAG and its officers questioned the intestate court’s authority to execute orders annulling the sales and argued deprivation of property without due process, contending the trial court’s determination was provisional and should await a separate ownership action.

Supreme Court’s Analysis on Probate Court Authority

The Court reiterated that:
• Any disposition of estate property pending final adjudication requires prior court approval (Godoy v. Orellano; Dillena v. Court of Appeals; Man


...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.