Title
Lee vs. Commissioner of Immigration
Case
G.R. No. L-23446
Decision Date
Dec 20, 1971
Felisa Lee, a Chinese citizen married to a Filipino, sought judicial declaration of her Filipino citizenship. The Supreme Court ruled no legal procedure exists for such declarations, directing her to pursue administrative remedies with the Bureau of Immigration.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-23446)

Background of the Case

On June 22, 1958, Felisa Lee married Jackson Barra, claiming that her marriage endowed her with Filipino citizenship under the applicable law, particularly Section 15 of Commonwealth Act No. 473. Following a rejected request to the Immigration Commissioner for the cancellation of her alien registration in 1961, Felisa filed a petition in court on October 13, 1962, seeking recognition of her citizenship status and cancellation of her alien registration.

Jurisdictional Challenges

The Commissioner of Immigration moved to dismiss Felisa Lee's petition, arguing that the Court of First Instance lacked jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus and that the nature of the petition did not align with existing legal frameworks for declaratory relief. Felisa countered that her petition was not for mandamus but rather an action for judicial determination regarding her qualifications for citizenship.

Trial Court's Decision

On November 20, 1962, the trial court denied the motion to dismiss and later ruled in favor of Felisa Lee, affirming that she possessed all qualifications for Filipino citizenship due to her marriage. The court ordered that her Alien Certificate of Registration be cancelled upon the decision's finality.

Appeal and Legal Implications

The case proceeded to the Supreme Court upon the appeal of the Commissioner of Immigration, who contended that Felisa Lee's petition functioned as a request for declaratory relief. The Supreme Court emphasized that there is no established judicial procedure for declaring an individual's citizenship, noting the importance of properly establishing citizenship for legal transactions.

Ruling on Citizenship Procedure

In discussing citizenship for aliens married to Filipino citizens, the Supreme Court pointed to a gap in the procedural law regarding the determination of citizenship claims, highlighting that the absence of a proper procedure does not negate the legitimacy of citizenship upon marriage. The Court suggested that Felisa should follow administrative protocols outlined in the Bureau o

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.