Case Summary (G.R. No. 83699)
Relevant Facts
At approximately 11:30 AM on the aforementioned date, Rogelio Monterola, traveling on a motorcycle, collided with a cargo van operated by Jaime Tano, Jr. The van was approaching the Bislig Airport when Tano, hampered by poor visibility due to dust raised by two racing vehicles, attempted a left turn without ensuring it was safe to do so. As a result, Monterola's motorcycle crashed into the right side of Tano's van, leading to Monterola's death.
Procedural History
Following the collision, a criminal charge for "homicide through reckless imprudence" was filed against Tano, alongside a civil case initiated by Monterola's heirs for damages. The Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 29, Surigao del Sur dismissed both cases on July 29, 1990, attributing the accident to the negligence of the deceased Monterola. The heirs appealed this decision to the Court of Appeals, which rendered a verdict reversing the RTC's ruling on July 18, 1991, ordering Tano and LBC Air Cargo to compensate the plaintiffs.
Issues Raised
The petitioners, Tano and LBC Air Cargo, contested the Court of Appeals’ findings, arguing that the appellate court erred in determining negligence and identifying the proximate cause of the accident. They claimed that Monterola's speeding constituted contributory negligence that should absolve Tano of liability.
Appellate Court's Findings on Negligence
The appellate court assessed the conditions under which Tano executed his left turn. It established that Tano admitted visibility was poor at that time, leading him to signal with his left signal and headlights but ultimately failing to ensure safety before making the turn. The court concluded that Tano's decision to turn left in such conditions constituted negligence, creating a dangerous environment directly contributing to the accident.
Application of Legal Doctrines
The doctrines of "proximate cause" and "last clear chance" were pivotal in the appellate court's reasoning. Proximate cause was attributed to Tano's negligent actions, which made him primarily responsible despite any contributory negligence from Monterola. Tano's failure to maintain the necessary level of caution in poor visibility led to the assumption of risk that Monterola’s motorcycle would ultimately collide with the van.
Contributory Negligence Considerations
While the appellate court held Tano primarily liable, it acknowledged Monterola's contributory negligence for traveling at a high speed in unsafe conditions. Thus, the court decreed a reduction of the damages awarded to the plaintiffs by twenty percent, reflecting Monterola's partial responsibility for the accident.
Damages Awarded
The appellate court outlined specific damages to be awarded to the plaintiffs, including indemnity for death, actual damages for motorcycle repa
...continue readingCase Syllabus (G.R. No. 83699)
Case Overview
- This case involves a petition for review questioning the Court of Appeals' decision that reversed the trial court's dismissal of a civil suit arising from a vehicular collision.
- The collision occurred on November 15, 1987, between a motorcycle driven by Rogelio Monterola and a cargo van owned by LBC Air Cargo and driven by Jaime Tano.
- The case examines the application of the doctrines of "proximate cause" and "last clear chance."
Facts of the Case
- Rogelio Monterola was riding his Suzuki motorcycle on a dusty national road in Bislig, Surigao del Sur, when he collided with a cargo van driven by Jaime Tano, who was attempting a left turn towards the airport road.
- Tano had initially stopped to allow two racing vehicles to pass but then made a sharp turn without waiting for the dust to settle, which impaired visibility.
- The collision resulted in the death of Rogelio Monterola, prompting a criminal case against Tano for "homicide thru reckless imprudence" and a civil suit by Monterola's heirs for damages.
Procedural History
- The Regional Trial Court dismissed both the criminal and civil cases on the grounds that Monterola's negligence was the proximate cause of the accident.
- The heirs of Monterola appealed the dismissal of the civil case to the Court of Appeals, which reversed the trial court's ruling on July 18, 1991.
Court of Appeals Decision
- The Court of Appeals found Tano negligent for making a left turn under poor visibility conditions without adequately sign