Title
Langkaan Realty Development, Inc. vs. United Coconut Planters Bank
Case
G.R. No. 139437
Decision Date
Dec 8, 2000
LANGKAAN failed to redeem mortgaged property after GUIMARAS' loan default; SC upheld extrajudicial foreclosure sale, ruling posting, publication, and notice errors immaterial.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 139437)

Factual Background

Langkaan Realty Development, Inc. was the registered owner of a parcel of land measuring 631,693 square meters, secured by a Real Estate Mortgage in favor of United Coconut Planters Bank for a loan of P5,000,000.00. The loan was obtained by Guimaras Agricultural Development, Inc. and included an acceleration clause that allowed for immediate foreclosure upon default. Guimaras defaulted, leading UCPB to file a petition for extra-judicial foreclosure, resulting in a sale wherein the property was auctioned and sold to UCPB for P3,095,000.00, which was later confirmed by a Certificate of Sale.

Procedural History

After failing to redeem the foreclosed property within the redemption period, Langkaan attempted to repurchase the property. The offer was rejected, prompting Langkaan to file a Complaint for Annulment of Extra-judicial Foreclosure with the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Imus, Cavite. The RTC ruled in favor of UCPB, dismissing Langkaan's petition, which was subsequently affirmed by the Court of Appeals.

Legal Issues

The central issue was whether the extra-judicial foreclosure sale was valid on the grounds of purported non-compliance with Act No. 3135 concerning venue, posting, and publication of the Notice of Sale. The Supreme Court noted that it only addresses questions of law in such cases and does not re-examine factual evidence provided by lower courts.

Compliance with Notice and Publication Requirements

The Court affirmed the findings of lower courts regarding the notice and publication requirements of Act No. 3135. Evidence showed that the Notice of Sale was posted in three public places and was published in a newspaper of general circulation in Cavite, thereby satisfying the law's requirements. The Court upheld the positive testimony of the Deputy Sheriff regarding the posting as credible, while dismissing the opposing testimony as insufficient to outweigh the presumption of regularity in the Sheriff’s duties.

Venue of the Foreclosure Sale

With regards to the venue, the Supreme Court reviewed Act No. 3135, which stipulates that a foreclosure sale must occur within the province where the property is located. The real estate mortgage contract specified that such sales should occur at the provincial capital or in the municipal building where the property is situated. The foreclosed property being in Dasmarinas should have meant the sale occurred at the municipal building there.

Findings on Venue

Despite Langkaan’s contention that the venue for the sale should have been Trece Martires City (the provincial capital) or in Dasmarinas as per the stipulated terms, the Court emphasized that the general principle of waivable venue applies. It noted that Lang

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.